Randy,

Would a single males offspring from mult. clutches that had 100% consistent/reliable markers(ALL offspring have them) make that gene codom by defintion. Afterall, the odds of 1 in 4 to make a visual are the same for both simple recessive and codom(super)?

I am working with 2 males ( 1 CH and one WC) that I believe to be SUPERS based solely on their offspring from MULTIPLE clutches. It seems that most people assume that a visual WC or CH is either homozygous recessive or dominant. Nobody seems to consider a codominant animal. I know that VISUAL dominant animals being gatthered up would keep them from finding "their kind", breeding, and producing a super.

I know you can decipher what i am getting at Randy.

Am I way off. My animals are telling me I am not -- I think