Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,905

1 members and 1,904 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

» Stats

Members: 76,049
Threads: 249,209
Posts: 2,572,709
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Mikvik
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Old enough to remember. Freakie_frog's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-12-2004
    Location
    221b Baker Street
    Posts
    16,636
    Thanks
    462
    Thanked 3,884 Times in 2,148 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images: 107

    Re: Jack Hanna Phone Interview

    Quote Originally Posted by Emmastaff View Post
    I like his idea of signing a contract to have the animal returned to the breeder. It is much like what responsible dog breeders do, have their buyers sign a contract to return the dog if at any time the owner does not want it. If this was a requirement of breeders,I think it would deter irresponsible breeders. They would probably be more likely to screen who they sell to, as they do not want a ton of animals coming back to them in the future.

    Jack's idea is taking a concept that is the ideal in the dog world (which itself is plagued with irresponsible breeders, puppy mills, and tons of animals in shelters) and tries to apply it to the reptile world. The only problem I see is that it would have to be a requirement, where as in the dog world it is only "preferred". There are still lots of irresponsible breeders in the dog world, and in the reptile world, if we want to preserve our rights to keep these animals, perhaps it would have to become the reality and not just the ideal. Not really sure how that would be done though? Really irresponsible breeding and selling is a problem in every type of animal, dogs, horses, cats, you see it everywhere.

    It is too bad reptiles are singled out as much as they are. But the reality is that the spotlight is on herps, and because of that, we need to do something about it. Perhaps the reason for this is that there is not a universal solution for the disposal of unwanted reptiles. Dogs and cats have animal shelters, horses have rescue organizations, and the unfortunate method of slaughter. There really is no solution out there for unwanted reptiles, so either there needs to be one, or more control over who they go to in the first place.
    I don't like that idea one bit..It's not my responsibility as a breeder to make sure your pet gets looked after when you "Don't want it" anymore. IT doesn't work in dogs or cats..why they hell would we think it works differently in reptiles..

    There is a solution to unwanted Reptiles..DON"T FREAKING BUY ONE IF YOU CAN"T CARE FOR IT FOR IT'S ENTIRE LIFE SPAN..
    Responsible Pet Ownership not Disposable Pet Ownership.


    The problem is that it puts all the commitment on the breeder and requires none of the keeper.. You want me to take it back..fine there is a 75% restocking fee based on its current market value.
    Last edited by Freakie_frog; 12-22-2009 at 11:57 AM.
    When you've got 10,000 people trying to do the same thing, why would you want to be number 10,001? ~ Mark Cuban
    "for the discerning collector"



  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Freakie_frog For This Useful Post:

    ballpythonluvr (12-22-2009),catawhat75 (12-22-2009),ColdBloodedCarnival (12-22-2009),Denial (12-22-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1