Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 611

0 members and 611 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,201
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Banned herpmanout82's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-09-2009
    Posts
    7
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

    Re: Newest email from USARK- Python ban moves forward

    Quote Originally Posted by Eventide View Post
    According to USARK's most recent Tweet, the bill has been amended to include only the nine species included in the bogus USGS paper. Yes, this means that ball pythons are off the chopping block, but it also means that there are nine species (including many subspecies) still threatened. Boa constrictors are on there too, though it doesn't say specifically if they're referring to all subspecies of boa constrictor or anything that's a boa that constricts. They need to list all species and subspecies in these bills instead of being stupidly vague.
    Ok this sounds bad, who is on the side of this community? What about "big shots" like Jeff Corwin, Nigel what's-his-name and the rest of the Animal Planet crew? Are these fellas even remotely involved with the support of this bill or against?

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to herpmanout82 For This Useful Post:

    Chocolate Muffin's (12-10-2009),Chris Behof (12-11-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1