Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 574

0 members and 574 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Threaded View

  1. #24
    BPnet Lifer Vypyrz's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-13-2009
    Location
    Morehead City, North Carolina
    Posts
    5,528
    Thanks
    554
    Thanked 1,800 Times in 1,267 Posts
    Images: 38

    Re: Will you be saying bye bye to your Ball Pythons?

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcrystal22 View Post
    There is reason for the pathetic turnouts compared to HR669. We had more than a month before the bill was going to be heard and for this it hardly seems like hardly have a week to work and spread the word of this new bill. If we had known about this earlier, I think it would have made more of an impact.
    I think some of it also had to do with 669 affecting a broader piece of the pet industry. The exotic fish, bird and mammal people may think this is a "python issue" and that they are safe, so they will sit this one out. I don't know what PetSmarts position is on this, but would they really care if they lost their BP's? I doubt it. They would just toss another Corn, King, or Gecko in the empty tank. But when their birds, fish, and guinea pigs are in jeopardy, along with the sales of the supplies to support them, that equals big financial loss, and that's when the corporate heat gets turned up...



    Rob
    "Cry, Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war..."

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Vypyrz For This Useful Post:

    nixer (11-04-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1