Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,486

0 members and 1,486 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,808
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LeonoraOrdonez5
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #17
    Registered User morphious's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-22-2009
    Location
    maryland
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts

    Re: If you think the idea of banning PITS is redic...

    Quote Originally Posted by GoingPostal View Post
    Not correct. UKC registers APBT and actually started as a fighting dog registry, AKC didn't want "pit" dogs so they changed the name, registered some, then closed the books so it's a pretty limited genepool and the type has changed quite a bit, Amstaffs tend to weigh more, bulkier build and head. There are dual registered Amstaffs/APBT but the standards are different and most people don't consider them to be the same breed anymore. UKC has headed that way as well unfortunately and most of their APBT look more like Amstaffs, whereas ADBA and AADR standards lean towards the working, athletic type pit bull.
    my bad it's the AKC not the UKC but no matter how you look at it they are the same dog. One's breed to work and one's breed to be pretty but they both go back to the same dog's if you look back in ther pedigree far enough.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to morphious For This Useful Post:

    HypoPita (10-30-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1