» Site Navigation
1 members and 614 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,808
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Registered User
Re: If you think the idea of banning PITS is redic...
 Originally Posted by HypoPita
what I find funny too is that Staffies aren't really that much different in stature or behavior, and could be confused for eachother by everyday people.
....buuuuut it's okay for me to have an astaffie but not pitbull 
American staffordshire terriers and American pit bull terriers are the same dog. back in the 40's when dog fighting was real big the people that showed the dog's went over to the UKC and register them as American staff's
-
The Following User Says Thank You to morphious For This Useful Post:
-
Re: If you think the idea of banning PITS is redic...
 Originally Posted by morphious
American staffordshire terriers and American pit bull terriers are the same dog. back in the 40's when dog fighting was real big the people that showed the dog's went over to the UKC and register them as American staff's
Not correct. UKC registers APBT and actually started as a fighting dog registry, AKC didn't want "pit" dogs so they changed the name, registered some, then closed the books so it's a pretty limited genepool and the type has changed quite a bit, Amstaffs tend to weigh more, bulkier build and head. There are dual registered Amstaffs/APBT but the standards are different and most people don't consider them to be the same breed anymore. UKC has headed that way as well unfortunately and most of their APBT look more like Amstaffs, whereas ADBA and AADR standards lean towards the working, athletic type pit bull.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to GoingPostal For This Useful Post:
-
Registered User
Re: If you think the idea of banning PITS is redic...
 Originally Posted by GoingPostal
Not correct. UKC registers APBT and actually started as a fighting dog registry, AKC didn't want "pit" dogs so they changed the name, registered some, then closed the books so it's a pretty limited genepool and the type has changed quite a bit, Amstaffs tend to weigh more, bulkier build and head. There are dual registered Amstaffs/APBT but the standards are different and most people don't consider them to be the same breed anymore. UKC has headed that way as well unfortunately and most of their APBT look more like Amstaffs, whereas ADBA and AADR standards lean towards the working, athletic type pit bull.
my bad it's the AKC not the UKC but no matter how you look at it they are the same dog. One's breed to work and one's breed to be pretty but they both go back to the same dog's if you look back in ther pedigree far enough.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to morphious For This Useful Post:
-
Registered User
Re: If you think the idea of banning PITS is redic...
German shepards used to be the bad ass dogs, then dobies. Now it's pit breeds and rotties. Filos and Cane Corsos seem like the next wave. Banning one breed will just make another more popular, and people will always use dogs as status symbols/ protection/ "living guns." I'm sure we've been doing that for tens of thousands of years.
Beautiful pups, GoingPostal.
Would you breed a wobbler dog even though it had a cool coat?
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|