Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 991

1 members and 990 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,945
Threads: 249,141
Posts: 2,572,339
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, SONOMANOODLES
Results 1 to 10 of 292

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Royalty SlitherinSisters's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-26-2008
    Location
    SE Iowa
    Posts
    14,644
    Thanks
    2,135
    Thanked 4,381 Times in 3,885 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Images: 70

    Re: TOFFEE Ball PROVEN

    Quote Originally Posted by icygirl View Post
    Not that I know much about this morph, but here's something that confuses me about this thread...



    How can Urban Python be 100% sure that toffee is simple recessive, if they have only produced "hets" and no actual toffees? Unless they are assuming that Toffee and Candy are the same thing?
    That's what I was thinking. It could be one of those, what I would call paradox morphs, that shows up in Africa and the "morph" dies with that one snake. For example you breed two paradox albinos, that look like they could be a new morph, and you never prove it out, you never get hets-you might think you have hets, you try and try to prove out the hets, and nothing..... *sigh* (just look at all the unproved one-of-a-kind imported "morphs" ralph davis has on his website, some of those have been in the making for years and still aren't proven-IMO paradox morphs)

    I'm excited to see if Craig gets any toffees this coming season.
    Last edited by SlitherinSisters; 09-30-2009 at 01:01 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1