» Site Navigation
1 members and 860 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,121
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
Re: Are we feeding too much?
Well, if pinheading occurs, then I would agree--but if no signs of abnormal growth occur (beyond overall speed), I don't think it constitutes powerfeeding.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Are we feeding too much?
Measuring "shorter" lifespans seems hard to quantify. Perhaps the average is 20-30 years. So if a power-feed ballpython dies at 20, perhaps it was due to obesity or overfeeding, or perhaps it was something else (a secondary effect of PF or something completly unrelated), or just age. I don't aprove of powerfeeding and would never do it.
I think there is a HUGE problem when trying to measure the effects of "over" feeding and determining "how much is too much". To begin with our data pool is mostly juvinile or adult BP (few over age 8), second we don't usualy have necropsy data on death, we know relativly little about BP fisiology (health problems related to or provoqued by obesity, minimum and maximums of required nutrients, etc)... so on and so forth.
At this point most of it just seems speculation.
Obvious facts. Visual obecity is bad and should dealt with.
-
-
Re: Are we feeding too much?
 Originally Posted by Bundu Boy
That is a very good point there seclark.
Putting things into context. Humans have a much higher metabolism than reptiles, in relation we eat small amounts often to maintain energy for day to day activities. Ball pythons are recommended to be fed 10-15% of their body weight, I weigh 85kg, but I don't eat 8.5-13kg at each meal...
 Originally Posted by Bundu Boy
I think we cannot compare our eating needs/habits to those of a reptile...
Yes we can. This was something I did a couple of weeks ago and had some interesting conclusions. I am 6'-3" and weigh 220lbs. According to the 10-15% rule, I would need to eat 22-33 lbs of food. Impossible, I thought. Then I remebered that is for one week, which works out to 3.1- 4.7 lbs of food per day. So I headed off to the kitchen to look at some of my food. Keep in mind that this doesn't account for calories, only food weight. Here's what I found:
1- can of green beens, wt. 16oz
1- can of corn.............wt. 16oz
1- can of tuna.............wt. 16oz
Now, look at it like this: Servings per container,
1-can of green bean- 3.5
1-can of corn--------3.5
1 can of tuna-------- 2
My conclusion: If you eat 1 can of tuna and 2 cans of vegetables, that is 2 servings of meat and 7 servings of vegetables per day. Toss in a couple slices of whole grain bread, a couple pieces of fruit and a glass of milk, and you fall within the 10-15% per week and I also comply with that nutritional pyramid thing...
 Originally Posted by Bundu Boy
But your comments about feeding less on a set schedule are interesting. I have been mulling this over in my mind. I think that 10-15% of body weight one a week is too much, I feel that 5% would be more suitable each week. This would allow less fat to be stored on the animal whilst still providing it with all the nourishment it needs to grow...
I have also been wrestling with this concerning my adult male. Applying the 10-15% rule, I should feed him a rat weighing 230-352g every 14 days. I know for a fact that he will not eat rats this big. I have offered. Instead, I cut the weight in half and offer a rat 120-160g every 7 days. Usually 3 days after eating, he will start roaming his tank at night until next feeding day. I was thinking about putting him on a diet and feeding him the smaller size rat every 14 days, which would equal 10-15% of his weight per month, instead of per week, and give him another week between feedings to roam off some his love handles. But then again, I'm not so sure he is even overweight, since there are no recommended size/weight charts. He doesn't look overweight, just dominant. I was thinking about starting another thread and see if people will post the length and weight of some of their males so I can at least get a comparison to work off of...
 Originally Posted by Bundu Boy
These are my thoughts, I've not seen hard facts that feeding smaller meals is detrimental, but I've found plenty saying that feeding every 7-14 days is too much...
There have been alot of good posts in this thread on both sides of this issue. The fact remains that there are just no conclusive scientific experiments. Why don't some of the members in the Biology, Zoology, or veterinary fields just apply for a government grant to conduct the studies. I mean, if people can get grants to study cow farts and earthworm mating, surely they would give out a grant for research that would benefit the multi-billion dollar reptile industry...
Rob
"Cry, Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war..."
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Vypyrz For This Useful Post:
-
-
-
Registered User
Re: Are we feeding too much?
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Are we feeding too much?
i suggest, strongly, that when people have an adult keel over, or heck even a two year old animal... Get a necropsy done by a HERP vet who specifically works with snakes.
the liver, and other vital organs should be closely looked at.
id love to see those vet reports. As all this guessing does noone any good without any veterinary info.
JUST from the necropsies over the years ive seen done on animals, posted in various places over the internet... i find the information truly interesting, and think it will seriously aid our information and guide us to a proper care regimen with all the animals we keep in captivity.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Are we feeding too much?
I found this other link:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/s...07/2011956.htm
"At the 168th day [of fasting], the snakes lost about 9-24% of their initial body mass. They also reduced their energy expenditures by an average 80% over the test period.
Measurements revealed the snakes actually grew longer during the fast. He especially noticed that their heads had grown"
Interesting that an almost 6 month fast only lost 9-24% of body mass. I wonder how these fasting periods afect snakes. In humans fasting can have huge detrimental effects such as digestive problems later in life, stomach ulcers, food rejection, no absorption of nutrients, etc. particularly if you go off of a fast with a huge meal instead of slowly "re-conditioning" your tomach to food (many of Ghandi´s followers faced these problems, many of which died shortly after extended fasts). In snakes its probably a completly diferent set of issues, due to the nature of their evolution and environment.
-
-
Re: Are we feeding too much?
I was just thinking about something else that may contribute to this. What about housing and enclosures? I assume in the wild it goes something like, BP smells rat in hole, BP goes in hole, eats rat, stays in hole until hungry, BP goes off looking for another rat (or something similar). Now, since they are moving and roaming between kills or looking for mates, they would get a certain degree of exercise. I keep refering to my adult male because he is a good example. Currently he is in a 50gal tank, 36 X 18 X 18. After he eats he stays in his hides for about 3 days. But after that he is out roaming the tank, sometimes for hours at night. crawling around, trying to climb the walls etc. And he will do this every night until I feed him again. So he is, in effect, getting some exercise. Now compare that to my snakes who live in a tub.
The only time I see them out of their hides is when they are drinking water, switching hides, or passing waste. They might make a lap or two around the tub then it is back in the hide. I know roaming during the day is a sign of stress, but being nocturnal means they should be "active" at night. So is it possible that by keeping them in tubs, where they only have their hides and water bowl, that we are not providing them with the space to be active and get some needed exercise. I'm not saying that tubs are all bad, just that they may benefit better in a larger, or a tub with a little more room for them to roam, explore, search for food, work all their muscles,whatever you want to call it. Applying my human logic to reptiles, it would be like going to the gym and only doing bench presses and nothing else. Your chest and arms would benefit but your legs and stomach would remain soft and flabby. Kind of like keeping a dog on a short chain with no room to run around. I know that they are not arboreal but they do seem to enjoy climbing over and around branches and things, possibly because it lets them uses their muscles in different ways and burn off some of the calories. So I'm thinking in some cases, it may be not so much over-feeding, but under-excersise. There again, we need that government grant for the research...
"Cry, Havoc! And let slip the dogs of war..."
-
-
Registered User
Re: Are we feeding too much?
Like others have stated, this is a very interesting thread. It really highlights how little is actually known about these guys.
In reference to the discussion about feeding to satiation weekly and whether or not it was power-feeding: I've often read posts on here that after a period of gorging, BPs will go through a fasting period. It seems to me that feeding to satiation just makes sense if the snake will self-regulate how much it ingests.
In reference to shortened lifespan from snakes fed "a lot": There isn't enough information to draw any conclusions on this. A while back I read something that suggested, in general, snakes that are overfed have shortened lifespans but this seemed like observational/anecdotal evidence. In order to test this, you'd need long-term studies with pretty large sample sizes. I just don't see that happening for snakes, ever. Snakes are too long-lived and there's way too many variables with something like this to address.
As for snakes eating 10-15% of their body weight weekly in comparison to humans: It's an interesting argument, but snakes have lower metabolic rates than us; they don't have to provide their own body heat. If we go by that, then 10-15% seems like it'd be too much.
In regards to exercise, I think I'm starting to agree with Vypryz. Roaming in search of food would really burn calories; our snakes in their small enclosures don't ever really do anything. Vypryz, does your guy eat regularly in his large tank? Assuming that it's cluttered enough and ample temps and hides are provided, it seems like the way to go. I'm sure it's harder to manage for you (e.g. cleaning, maintaining temps) but it may just be better for your snake. I'm thinking I should let my girl roam around the floor (supervised of course) a bit more often.
Also, what's pinheading? I've long thought that my snake has a small head in relation to her body. I read something recently that suggested snakes fed larger food items have larger heads; I've fed my snake multiple mice for the past year until recently switching her to rats.
Sorry for the long post, but I hadn't replied in quite a while and wanted to address a few points. Also, I'll mention again that perhaps a length:weight relationship wouldn't be a bad idea. I think there's probably a stronger relationship than we think (addresses the idea of overweight snakes, even though all of our snakes may just be overweight to begin with) but we'd need quite a few snakes to find out anything. Just my thoughts...
-- B
-
-
Re: Are we feeding too much?
 Originally Posted by Vypyrz
I was just thinking about something else that may contribute to this. What about housing and enclosures? I assume in the wild it goes something like, BP smells rat in hole, BP goes in hole, eats rat, stays in hole until hungry, BP goes off looking for another rat (or something similar). Now, since they are moving and roaming between kills or looking for mates, they would get a certain degree of exercise. I keep refering to my adult male because he is a good example. Currently he is in a 50gal tank, 36 X 18 X 18. After he eats he stays in his hides for about 3 days. But after that he is out roaming the tank, sometimes for hours at night. crawling around, trying to climb the walls etc. And he will do this every night until I feed him again. So he is, in effect, getting some exercise. Now compare that to my snakes who live in a tub.
The only time I see them out of their hides is when they are drinking water, switching hides, or passing waste. They might make a lap or two around the tub then it is back in the hide. I know roaming during the day is a sign of stress, but being nocturnal means they should be "active" at night. So is it possible that by keeping them in tubs, where they only have their hides and water bowl, that we are not providing them with the space to be active and get some needed exercise. I'm not saying that tubs are all bad, just that they may benefit better in a larger, or a tub with a little more room for them to roam, explore, search for food, work all their muscles,whatever you want to call it. Applying my human logic to reptiles, it would be like going to the gym and only doing bench presses and nothing else. Your chest and arms would benefit but your legs and stomach would remain soft and flabby. Kind of like keeping a dog on a short chain with no room to run around. I know that they are not arboreal but they do seem to enjoy climbing over and around branches and things, possibly because it lets them uses their muscles in different ways and burn off some of the calories. So I'm thinking in some cases, it may be not so much over-feeding, but under-excersise. There again, we need that government grant for the research...
I have read basically the same thing. Another thing worth mentioning is that we feed 1 appropriately sized meal because its easy for us. My understanding is that in the wild they will enter a burrow that usually has more than one rodent living inside. Eat the contents of the burrow and then digest till they are hungry. My BP lives in a 3x2x2 plastic enclosure and she exhibits the same behaviors. Eats, rests for 1 to 3 days depending on how many mice she ate. Then roams the enclosure seemingly looking for food. Occasionally like last night I will try to feed a day early. I offered a 34 gram mouse to her (711 grams) 6 days following a meal of 2 mice totallying 64 grams. She refused. Now I was thinking I really should have waited until I returned from a wedding this weekend and fed on Sunday (9 days from her last feeding.) As usual she proved to me that I should trust my instincts. My point with all that data is that if I feed to often she refuses, when she is ready she eats.
 Originally Posted by branson
Like others have stated, this is a very interesting thread. It really highlights how little is actually known about these guys.
In reference to the discussion about feeding to satiation weekly and whether or not it was power-feeding: I've often read posts on here that after a period of gorging, BPs will go through a fasting period. It seems to me that feeding to satiation just makes sense if the snake will self-regulate how much it ingests.
In reference to shortened lifespan from snakes fed "a lot": There isn't enough information to draw any conclusions on this. A while back I read something that suggested, in general, snakes that are overfed have shortened lifespans but this seemed like observational/anecdotal evidence. In order to test this, you'd need long-term studies with pretty large sample sizes. I just don't see that happening for snakes, ever. Snakes are too long-lived and there's way too many variables with something like this to address.
As for snakes eating 10-15% of their body weight weekly in comparison to humans: It's an interesting argument, but snakes have lower metabolic rates than us; they don't have to provide their own body heat. If we go by that, then 10-15% seems like it'd be too much.
In regards to exercise, I think I'm starting to agree with Vypryz. Roaming in search of food would really burn calories; our snakes in their small enclosures don't ever really do anything. Vypryz, does your guy eat regularly in his large tank? Assuming that it's cluttered enough and ample temps and hides are provided, it seems like the way to go. I'm sure it's harder to manage for you (e.g. cleaning, maintaining temps) but it may just be better for your snake. I'm thinking I should let my girl roam around the floor (supervised of course) a bit more often.
Also, what's pinheading? I've long thought that my snake has a small head in relation to her body. I read something recently that suggested snakes fed larger food items have larger heads; I've fed my snake multiple mice for the past year until recently switching her to rats.
Sorry for the long post, but I hadn't replied in quite a while and wanted to address a few points. Also, I'll mention again that perhaps a length:weight relationship wouldn't be a bad idea. I think there's probably a stronger relationship than we think (addresses the idea of overweight snakes, even though all of our snakes may just be overweight to begin with) but we'd need quite a few snakes to find out anything. Just my thoughts...
-- B
Ball Pythons have small heads compared to their body normally but this can be made much worse by over feeding. I don't think this is something you can control by adjusting the size of the food items offered. This is like saying I shouldn't be fat because I only eat a single slice of pizza every hour vs, a whole pizza for dinner. Recently someone posted a study on fasting in snakes and basically found that when snakes fast their heads get bigger to allow the snake to consume a meal it would have otherwise had to pass on. The hungrier it gets the less choosy it can be. The reverse would make sense. If a snake is overfed its head could be staying small to keep it from eating larger and larger prey. The snakes brain isn't controlling these decisions nor is its stomach. The snakes body chemistry is, and the body chemistry doesn't know what size meals it gets only the quantity and frequency of food. In orther words two 17 gram mice will have the same effect on the body chemistry as one 34 gram mouse.
I really feel like the 10% - 15% rule needs to be scaled back as the snake gets older and bigger. My now 711 gram BP will take about 8% of her body weight weekly but this is an average. She will take 1 mouse 5%, 2 mice 10% or 3 mice once so far 15%. I let her decide and I keep detailed records. She will also skip a meal on occasion. I have seen many people defend the 10% - 15% "rule" but admit that they feed every 10 days or every 2 weeks. It would be really interesting to gets some hard data for snakes that regulate themselves well. Of course snakes are individuals. I have one fat cat and one skinny cat. They eat the same food and eat as much or as little as they want. If we took the weights, lengths, feeding dates, deification and urates dates, feeding dates, weight and number of food items offered for snakes that regulate themselves. Included husbandry data and enclosure type and size. We might be able to get a good idea of how much mass a BP should consume weekly. It would then be pretty easy to look at our individual schedules, prey types and decide if we need to make adjustments. If you are comming out low then you take a day of your schedule or add a day and offer another food item, or offer larger food items if you can do that.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|