Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 649

0 members and 649 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,106
Posts: 2,572,115
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Threaded View

  1. #15
    BPnet Veteran Mendel's Balls's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-07-2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,073
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
    Images: 40

    Re: snakes can digest their own hearts!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    This would certainly be considered unconscionable cruelty if it were conducted on any mammalian species.
    I'm not entirely sure I appreciate the 'ends justify the means' mentality in this experiment. I'm all for science, but starving, beating, delivering electrical shocks to, depriving of water, isolating, drowning, and various other cruel behavioral and metabolic experiments are pretty hard for any ethical person to justify.
    This experiment involved torture. It may be a torture that some snakes would be subjected to in the wild, but that is really not the point, is it?

    When a ball python fasts for half the year, this is natural--when it is deprived of food for half the year at a time when it would choose to eat, by the deliberate actions of a person...this is animal cruelty.
    I don't see how it was torture if these same snakes experience very similar conditions in the wild.

    Furthermore, I cant believe the actual article did not mention the snakes were first euthanized before they were sent to the blender. Very poor science journalism there! The way the author describes it would never pass mustard with IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees). Most people, unfortunately, do not know how strict regulations and compliance surveillance are in research labs.
    Last edited by Mendel's Balls; 08-18-2009 at 12:21 PM.
    ~ 1.0.0 Python regius ~ Wild-type ~
    ~
    1.0.0 Canis familiaris ~ Blue Italian Greyhound ~

    ~ 0.0.9 Danio rerio~ Wild-type and Glofish




  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Mendel's Balls For This Useful Post:

    littleindiangirl (08-20-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1