Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 874

0 members and 874 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,903
Threads: 249,097
Posts: 2,572,069
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, wkeith67
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Mendel's Balls's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-07-2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,073
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
    Images: 40

    Re: I Attended the HR2811 Hearing on July 29th

    Quote Originally Posted by DutchHerp View Post
    Texas got freezing temperatures this year; snow actually. If there was viable scientific evidence my pythons could cause ecological problems, then yes, I would relocate them.

    Where is the scientific evidence that points to the Florida Burmese populations causing a net ecological and/or economic loss? Point me to that peer-reviewed scientific paper please.

    If you cant produce one, your assuming guilt before innocence.....seems like that rule then should apply to you and your animals as well then.

    Furthermore, as Adam said this is a state issue...why are the feds pushing this? Florida Wildlife officials were are dealing with the issue.

    There is no evidence that populations exist in any other states or will exist in any other southern states with global climate changes models.
    ~ 1.0.0 Python regius ~ Wild-type ~
    ~
    1.0.0 Canis familiaris ~ Blue Italian Greyhound ~

    ~ 0.0.9 Danio rerio~ Wild-type and Glofish




  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mendel's Balls For This Useful Post:

    Alice (07-31-2009),Brewster320 (07-30-2009),Muze (07-30-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1