NRIP? Is this a new HR669?

[Adam_Wysocki]

I posted in the other thread regarding this as well. I do not, as it stands, support this program. Sorry. the fees are too high for me to want to bother with it when i do everything in it on my own for free, without someone telling me im doing everything right. The fauna BOI is good enough for me, and besides, i appreciate a peer reviewed method anyway.

With any large group of people you'll certainly have all different views as to what will and won't work for each on a case by case basis. NRIP is of course completely voluntary and just as some people will choose to pursue accreditation, others will not.

Personally, I'm not a fan and NRIP either and don't plan on becoming accredited any time soon. But, I know that my input about what I think is and isn't workable in the program has been well received and is very appreciated by PIJAC.

I would encourage you to contact PIJAC (whether you're a member or not) with your concerns so that they can be taken into account and hopefully be considered during future revisions to NRIP program.

Not every idea or program that an organization like PIJAC (or any other organization) is going to be a home run out right off the bat. But, with great communication and constructive feedback from the community, we can all work together to better our industry.

Everyone has a voice and organizations like USARK, PIJAC, NAIA, etc are there to listen and support all of us.

-adam