Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 590

0 members and 590 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,197
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Registered User Marg's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-02-2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: NRIP? Is this a new HR669?

    Do I feel I have the right to own any reptile I want? Within limits - yes.
    Would I be willing to provide a registering body proof that I am a prepared
    and repsonsible owner of potentially dangerous or invasive reptile?
    Yes. Would I be willing to pay for a permit for the privilege of owning
    these reptiles? Of course. Do I think anyone off the street has the right
    to own a hot or a giant constrictor? No - and I have a big problem with
    anyone who encourages otherwise
    - they are only giving these legislators ammo.
    I do not know what a BMP ceritification program is.
    Is this like having a permit?

    I agree with this part I quoted.
    I also think just anyone off the street should own any animal,
    without prior knowledge of the proper care.

    I actually wish they already had some thing like this in place,
    when I got My first snake.

    I knew Nothing, and the pet shop attendant obviously didn't either.
    I was illinformed of supplies, and proper feed, and housing.

    I was not told of any heating requirements, nor about controling any
    heating elements.

    I was not even offered a care sheet, or told where I could find information.

    Joe Schmoe off the street should be required to prove they know proper
    care, and that they have proper housing, prior to purchasing any given species!

    Similar to taking a drivers licence test.
    One would need to answer specific questions, before they were allowed
    to purchase an animal, and prove, with pictures I suppose, that a proper
    enclosure was provided.
    (make sence?)

    Should we be required to microchip?
    I am caught between yes and no.

    Yes, because those ignorant persons who release any animal should be
    held responcible.

    No, because If a law was passed where our animals would be ceased,
    and or destroyed, I would not want anyone knowing where I reside.

    I have put a lot of care and effort into my pets,
    not to mention time and money!

    Marg
    Last edited by Marg; 04-29-2009 at 11:07 PM. Reason: omitted a quote bracket

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1