Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 662

1 members and 661 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,191
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-30-2009
    Posts
    423
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 43 Times in 41 Posts

    I'm starting to worry about hr 669...

    I've posted the bill and plenty of links/info on other forums.

    so far, plenty of people are SUPPORTING THE BILL.... no one is defending herpers.

    anyone else having similar woes?

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran PythonWallace's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-26-2007
    Location
    Woodridge, IL
    Posts
    2,967
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 346 Times in 210 Posts
    Images: 23

    Re: I'm starting to worry about hr 669...

    The general public has an unfounded hatred and fear for snakes and reptiles in general. I think that is why it's important to stress animals like hamsters and tropical fish, instead of pretending it's just an attack on snake owners. The reality is that the general population would be fine with banning snakes.
    What are these mojavas I keep hearing so much about?

    J. W. Exotics

    Reptile Incubators

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-30-2009
    Posts
    423
    Thanks
    157
    Thanked 43 Times in 41 Posts

    Re: I'm starting to worry about hr 669...

    Quote Originally Posted by PythonWallace View Post
    The general public has an unfounded hatred and fear for snakes and reptiles in general. I think that is why it's important to stress animals like hamsters and tropical fish, instead of pretending it's just an attack on snake owners. The reality is that the general population would be fine with banning snakes.
    i've used all examples, people want to keep focusing on pet gorillas and rhinos.... sarcastic idiots...

    i urge all to post threads on any site they can; even if you're put down or insulted, at least it's getting info out, and letting others know this is going on.

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    09-14-2007
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    3,250
    Thanks
    170
    Thanked 703 Times in 538 Posts

    Re: I'm starting to worry about hr 669...

    For anyone that still believes this bill has no chance...

    ...have you seen the stats that show that groups like PETA and HSUS have just as much money (actually more) to push this bill forward than the pet industry has to fight it?
    http://nohr669.com/blog/?p=136

    ...have you seen the stats that 80% of legislation that Wayne Pacelle (President & CEO of HSUS) supports gets passed?
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...004Aug8_4.html

    ...have you seen the stats that in just a 2 year period of time ('06-'08), Wayne Pacelle and HSUS have worked for the passage of more than 225 new state laws, and more than 15 federal statutes?
    http://www.hsus.org/about_us/board_a...wayne_pacelle/

    These people know exactly what they are doing and how to get things passed! Now, I'll admit, I probably agreed with some of the laws they supported, the ones that were aimed at ending cruelty to animals. However, it is no secret that they want all animal ownership to end, and I don't agree with that! I won't supply a link for this one, because it is dozens of places all over the internet, but here is one quote from Wayne Pacelle:
    One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals.
    Do you think HR 669 will not get passed, because it is too sweeping and our government would not outlaw harmless animals? Look at what JUST happened in CT:
    http://ball-pythons.net/forums/showthread.php?t=89528
    They outlawed quite a few species of animals, some of which are dangerous, and some of which are not. One example is poison arrow frogs. Here is info from the National Zoo:
    Not all arrow frogs are deadly, and only three species are very dangerous to humans....Arrow frogs are not poisonous in captivity. Scientists believe that these frogs gain their poison from a specific arthropod and other insects that they eat in the wild.
    Wow. Good thing the population in Connecticut now has nothing to fear from harmless captive poison arrow frogs.

    WAKE UP! The time has come! There WILL be legislation passed. The only thing we can hope for is to make our voice heard loud and clear so that whatever legislation is passed will be well thought out, based on real facts instead of unreasonable fears, and will damage our hobby as little as possible.
    Casey

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kc261 For This Useful Post:

    dr del (04-16-2009),neilgolli (04-16-2009),PythonWallace (04-16-2009)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1