Re: Any one that wants to do more about HR669 - READ THIS NOW!
Originally Posted by icygirl
I just finished my letters and turns out there are 23 committee members, not 22.
Really? The list I have seen has 22 names on it. I just re-counted it to be sure. Perhaps somewhere along the way, one of the names got dropped off the list somehow.
Where did you get your list? Do you mind posting it here so we can figure out where the extra name came from?
Re: Any one that wants to do more about HR669 - READ THIS NOW!
Originally Posted by kc261
Really? The list I have seen has 22 names on it. I just re-counted it to be sure. Perhaps somewhere along the way, one of the names got dropped off the list somehow.
Where did you get your list? Do you mind posting it here so we can figure out where the extra name came from?
I got it from the No HR669 blog...
This post was written by Adam Wysocki and he has 23 letters... But Ralph Davis' website has 22? I don't really know where the extra name came from!!
Re: Any one that wants to do more about HR669 - READ THIS NOW!
Oops.
I guess I need to figure out what person I can leave out. I have been going all day and have stacks of 22 letters signed. I can have some of the people to sign a 23rd. But some where friends of friends that I don't even know.
Re: Any one that wants to do more about HR669 - READ THIS NOW!
Originally Posted by kc261
Just curious how you came up with those 2 names?
I was talking to someone else about who to drop off my list and they just mentioned them as people NOT to drop off. Everyone is important. I didn't mean to sound like I was saying only send letters to them.
I'm just going to split my stuff up so that everyone gets something from my group of people.
Re: Any one that wants to do more about HR669 - READ THIS NOW!
is it ok if I put more then 10 papers in the manillas? And if I have say 30 people im doing this for and I do it this way should I put there address under the signature on all 22 papers for them so toms help doesent have such a hard time?