Quote Originally Posted by Neal View Post
Are you serious? I hope he's not serious.

You can't have it both ways, You can't agree with part of the bill then not agree with the other part of the bill.

No offense man, but that's seriously the dumbest thing i've heard.
PIJAC POSITION -- PIJAC supports the underlying intent of HR 669 to establish a risk-based process in order
to prevent the introduction of potentially invasive species. It has been clear for quite some time that steps are
needed to enhance and improve the current listing process for species shown to be injurious under the Lacey Act.
In addition to much needed appropriations to fund staff and other ancillary support aids, the Lacey Act needs to
be modernized to make the process more timely, efficient and transparent. However, HR 669 falls far short of
accomplishing this objective.


Not my words Neal. Not the OP's either.

I know some clown is going to jump on this and claim I support the Bill. Let me make it clear - I do not.

I do however, agree with PIJAC's position regarding additional steps being needed to improve the current listing process for potentially injurious species.