The nature of the problem of proving a mutation homozygous lethal is that it's much harder to produce credible evidence of something not existing than that it might exist.
I'll have to find and re-read the evidence from the keeper here. I didn't doubt at all that the info was accurate; my only question was if it was enough to be very significant. I remember when I first read it just didn't seem like enough spiders in a row. I also remember there where a lot of dead eggs which should be randomly distributed between spiders and non spider offspring so really shouldn't matter but it did make me wonder if somehow the dead eggs tainted even the streak of spiders that was presented. It would have also been nice to know if that male spider even had the chance to be homozygous by having both spider parents. Hopefully that male will be able to produce some more full term eggs this year.
I think I've only heard detailed results from a single spider x spider breeding so too small to be significant that 1/4 of the eggs where undersized and didn't hatch.









Reply With Quote