Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 738

1 members and 737 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,904
Threads: 249,099
Posts: 2,572,073
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, GeneticArtist
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Hi,

    I think I've worked out how to use tables (it took me long enough ) on here - is this what you were trying to post?


    If I've messed it up during the learning curve let me know and I'll try and fix it.

    And here is the code to do it to save anyone else having the same problems I did;

    [TABLE] |[B]PS[/B] |[B]Ps[/B] |[B]pS [/B]|[B]ps[/B]
    [B]PS[/B] |PPSS |PPSs |PpSS |PpSs
    [B]Ps [/B]|PPSs |PPss |PpSs |Ppss
    [B]pS[/B] |PpSS |PpSs |ppSS |ppSs
    [B]ps[/B] |PpSs |Ppss |ppSs |ppss[/TABLE]


    dr del
    Last edited by dr del; 03-22-2009 at 04:26 PM. Reason: tried to add a title and messed it up - more learning needed
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to dr del For This Useful Post:

    Corvid (03-22-2009)

  3. #12
    BPnet Veteran Corvid's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-20-2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    152
    Thanked 45 Times in 43 Posts
    Images: 19

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Beautiful!
    "I don't want to make money, I just want to be wonderful." ~Marilyn Monroe

  4. #13
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Thanks! I thought briefly about trying square brackets instead of <> and should have but I had no idea about the pipes. I'll change my Excel macro that generates the code and maybe experiment a bit more. It will be nice to be able to do squares on this forum.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to RandyRemington For This Useful Post:

    dr del (03-23-2009)

  6. #14
    BPnet Veteran GenePirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-11-2009
    Location
    Coastal South Carolina
    Posts
    249
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 101 Times in 73 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Quote Originally Posted by RandyRemington View Post
    I'm with you on this. I think that realizing that pastels and spiders are hets makes it much easier to predict offspring from complex crosses.

    Also, I'm not sure what the latest official notation is but I like the upper and lower case letters to show that there are two different "normal" genes involved in this cross; normal for pastel and normal for spider. I would write bumblebee X bumblebee as PpSs X PpSs with the P being the pastel mutant version and p the normal for pastel version and likewise S the spider mutant and s the normal for spider.
    Yep, you are correct that a pastel (i.e.) is het for that mutation. It just becomes difficult when someone says "het for pastel" because that implies that two mutated alleles make a pastel. But, a pastel is a het (het for that chromatophore anomaly).
    And, yes, in my career I've always done the cap/small letter (i.e., Pp) to indicate one mutated allele for (let's say) pastel and the other unmutated homologous allele (homologous roughly meaning paired or same location). So, for those who need an example, PpHh would be a pastel het for ghost (hypo), and PpHH would be a pastel ghost--you can make up your own letters. It could be helpful for some to insert "n" where there is a normal allele, but for me, it's just too busy. So Randy, Corvid, Dr. Del....good posts. I concur.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to GenePirate For This Useful Post:

    Corvid (04-23-2009)

  8. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-25-2008
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Quote Originally Posted by GenePirate View Post
    Yep, you are correct that a pastel (i.e.) is het for that mutation. It just becomes difficult when someone says "het for pastel" because that implies that two mutated alleles make a pastel. But, a pastel is a het (het for that chromatophore anomaly).
    And, yes, in my career I've always done the cap/small letter (i.e., Pp) to indicate one mutated allele for (let's say) pastel and the other unmutated homologous allele (homologous roughly meaning paired or same location). So, for those who need an example, PpHh would be a pastel het for ghost (hypo), and PpHH would be a pastel ghost--you can make up your own letters. It could be helpful for some to insert "n" where there is a normal allele, but for me, it's just too busy. So Randy, Corvid, Dr. Del....good posts. I concur.
    The way I read things, when someone says "het for x" they are referring to x as a recessive trait i.e. not visibly discernable from normal.

    "Het x" (without the for) to me represents a dom/codom trait that is not a homozygous animal, though both examples could be considered correct.

    To muddy things further, if referring to a codominant trait, if you use the term "heterozygous" then you should name the super form to be technically correct.

    I have no issue with "het" being used with a dom/codom trait, especially when working out squares. I just make sure to slow down and read very carefully.

    Clarifying questions are never a bad thing.

    Just my 2 cents.

  9. #16
    BPnet Veteran GenePirate's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-11-2009
    Location
    Coastal South Carolina
    Posts
    249
    Thanks
    92
    Thanked 101 Times in 73 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Please Check my HW

    All "heterozygous" means is that two different forms of an allele exist in the same location on two different homologous chromosomes. Heterozygous animals will phenotypically express whatever is encoded by the dominant allele. Obviously, if one of the alleles codes for a recessive trait, it will not be expressed in a heterozygous animal.

    And before anyone else brings this up about the lettering...Technically the small letters are used to represent recessive traits, and the cap letters are used to represent dominant traits. But, if you're into Punnett squares, do whatever is comfy.

  10. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Now that it looks like we have a completely dominant ball python mutation (pinstripe) perhaps our use of the word heterozygous will adjust a bit.

    I think many snake keepers’ first exposure to "het" was with recessive mutations so they got to thinking that heterozygous meant "normal looking gene carrier". Some have since come around to the idea of a Pastel being a het so might be thinking heterozygous means "half way to some other morph" as in "Pastel is het for Super Pastel". But really heterozygous just means having an unmatched pair of genes at the locus you are talking about. Even without supers the Spiders and most all Pinstripes are still hets with one mutant gene paired with one normal gene. Perhaps we'll start seeing ads for heterozygous pinstripes (the ones sold so far) and both 100% and 33% possible homozygous pinstripes. Even though the het and homozygous pinstripe look the same understanding that a heterozygous pinstripe has one normal copy at the pinstripe locus helps you to see how it has a 50% chance of passing that normal version to an offspring while a homozygous pinstripe would always pass the pinstripe mutation.

  11. #18
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: Please Check my HW

    Wait,

    Can you link me to the proven homozygous pinstripe story - I missed that entirely.


    dr del
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  12. #19
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-13-2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,555
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 247 Times in 186 Posts
    Images: 28

    Re: Please Check my HW

    I was going by a Reptile Radio interview with BHB. The archive link I found again now:

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/reptile...00bNERD-vs-BHB

    I don’t see where I can tell how many minutes in it is but looks roughly 2/3 of the way through. I'm not aware of proof of a homozygous pinstripe being directly published on the web by anyone yet. But just going by that last August interview sounds like 22 for 22 pinstripes. He didn’t actually say that the females where not pinstripes but he does go on to say that he doesn’t see any obvious difference between that apparent homozygous pinstripe and a normal (i.e. heterozygous) pinstripe.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to RandyRemington For This Useful Post:

    dr del (04-25-2009)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1