Okay...I'm not big into morphs myself, but I'll admit there are some that look pretty cool and as long as there's no hybrids, more power to everyone that works morphs. But the appeal of some of these morphs are lost on me.

The first one is the woma ball. Honestly, the only beef I have about these guys is their name. I mean, there's already a woma python (completely different python species) and there are in existence, woma x ball hybrids (called "walls"). So...there has to be some confusion going around when someone refers to their "womas"; are they talking about a woma ball, or an actual woma? And likewise, when the name "woma ball" is mentioned, are they refering to a wall? I was just wondering what the thought process was behind the naming of the woma ball. IMHO, it looks nothing like a woma python. Does anyone else see this?

Second is that I know these morphs are dictating the ball python market and the industry in general, and thats great. BUt I think people are starting to split hairs when it comes to deciding these things. For instance, the yellow-belly, "russos" and the mojave balls; I've looked at these snakes and they look just like a normal ball to me minus a few minute subtle differences. And yet there's a difference of several hundreds of dollars in price. Am I missing something here? And the sable for example; its almost like someone was "well, this one's a little darker than the rest. Let's slap $500 on it."

Any thoughts?