I have talked to a couple people that have produced clutches, and they claimed to have missed it (and I beleive them).
Thats kind of what I've been wondering about. Maybe they DID hit the odds but they didn't know it because it just didn't look any different then a regular axanthic or a regular hypo. Maybe the axanthic gene covers up the hypo gene or the other way around or something like that? These two mutations have been around for such a long time that it just seems odd to me that someone hasn't hit on it already.

Mark