With the IBD problem growing daily, i wondered something and i would like everyones opinion.Should a person who continues to sell his snakes even after said person was shown proof that IBD is linked to his collection be prosecuted? Some have mentioned that no court could succed in prosecuting any such case.I think with enough evidence any jury would have no problem comming back with a guilty as charged decision.I used a example of how someone giving another AIDS when said person knows they have it being a felony now.Since IBD is concidered AIDS version for snakes.Since this act of selling these snakes to clear out the evidence will wipeout others collections and cause large monetary losses i feel said person should be prosecuted.What do you think? P.S. I am not trying to start any fights or upset anyone by asking for opinions here.If this poll is not allowed please let me know and delete it i will understand.