Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 680

1 members and 679 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,104
Posts: 2,572,103
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Registered User TraconSnake's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-13-2006
    Posts
    78
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Redundant Temp Controls?

    I'm wondering. I was researching into the Johnson Controls unit, and in the PDF document from the Johnson Controls site, there is this warning:

    Quote Originally Posted by http://cgproducts.johnsoncontrols.com/MET_PDF/125188.PDF

    IMPORTANT:
    The A419 Series Temperature
    Controls are intended to control equipment under
    normal operating conditions. Where failure or
    malfunction of an A419 Series Control could lead to
    an abnormal operating condition that could cause
    personal injury or damage to the equipment or other
    property, other devices (limit or safety controls) or
    systems (alarm or supervisory) intended to warn of
    or protect against failure or malfunction of the A419
    Series Control must be incorporated into and
    maintained as part of the control system.

    The document does state that the unit will shut off in the case of a sensor failure, and will also shut off in case of a program failure.

    However, this unit is relay controlled, and relays can stick in the closed position.

    So with the Johnson Controls unit, at least, the only way to ensure safety is to use two units - one as the main unit, and a second one set a couple degrees higher so that it will shut down the primary unit if it fails.

    I couldn't figure out what the Ranco and HerpStat units use for voltage control. Do either of those use solid state switching as opposed to a mechanical relay switch?

    Here's what I found for Ranco:
    http://www.icca.invensys.com/uniline/d/d71.pdf

    And for HerpStat:
    http://www.spyderrobotics.com/produc...ual_online.pdf

    Interestingly, HerpStat makes no claim that the unit will shut off in the event of a program failure.


    So, any thoughts on redundancy of temperature controls? Considering a BP can live over 20 years, I think one could assume that the risk of a temperature controller failing in that time frame is fairly high. So does anybody think the cost of an extra unit to maintain redundancy is justified, or is it okay if a snake is exposed to a 125 degree strip of flexwat for several hours (the time it may take for you to get home from work and notice the temperatures are way high)
    Last edited by TraconSnake; 04-08-2006 at 06:46 PM. Reason: Reformatted quote text

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1