Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 727

1 members and 726 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,122
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Super Moderator bcr229's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-18-2013
    Location
    Eastern WV Panhandle
    Posts
    9,567
    Thanks
    2,968
    Thanked 9,997 Times in 4,836 Posts
    Images: 34

    Re: New Lacey Act Amendments

    Quote Originally Posted by Homebody View Post
    2. The Secretary of the Interior will be able to add species to the injurious species list much more easily. In fact, you won't find out a species you breed or keep is being added until it has already happened, so there will be no way to stop it. We don't know to what extent the Secretary will use this power. She could add a bunch of commonly kept species to the list on day one, or she may not add a single species for the rest of her tenure. We don't know. We do know that every species added to the list will suffer the same fate as the retics and burms.
    This is incorrect. The amendment does away with the Lacey Act injurious species list and it will be replaced with a "white list" of approved animals. Anything not on the white list will be deemed injurious and thus not importable or transportable across state lines.

    This bill presents a fundamental change in how our laws have historically worked. In the past anything not explicitly declared illegal is by default legal, and it's how our government operates for all policies, not just animal species. By specifying a "white list" of what is legal - meaning some unelected government employee or official has to take steps to add species to a list - anything not on the list is automatically illegal whether or not that species is invasive/injurious.


    It wasn't all that long ago that the Tarahumara boa "locality" of boa imperator was actually declared its own species Boa Sigma. If this law were in place then anyone who owned a Tarahumara suddenly wouldn't be able to transport or ship them interstate until some government agency studied them and determined whether or not they should be added to the whitelist. This can happen with almost any exotic critter.


    I am in the eastern panhandle of WV and this really affects me as we don't have any exotic vet specialists local. There is one in Hagerstown, MD, and others in Winchester, Berryville, and Fairfax, VA. If this law passes I'd have to drive the critter on state or county roads to Charleston, WV which would take about 8 hours each way.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bcr229 For This Useful Post:

    Albert Clark (02-13-2022),Bogertophis (02-13-2022),dakski (02-12-2022),Erie_herps (02-12-2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1