So I have read different theories on it. Some say the males are driven to get to the females. Some say the females are driven to get with the males. Truth is most likely a combination of both. The males get the testosterone boost and the females putting off pheromones. Either way the drive to continue the blood line is an ornate designed of every species on the planet.
Not that I am planning on breeding, the question is, "At what point is nature stronger than our desire to keep them from it?" and "The ethics of breeding VS not breeding?". Boy am I asking some real though questions today. Lets make it easier to answer those questions.
1) Is it ethical to not allow a species to breed? Need VS desire.
2) Would it be more ethical to allow a species to breed and not hatch the eggs over not allowing to breed at all? To hatch or not to hatch or not to breed at all?
3) Is breeding a Need or just a Desire? Some species are more driven than others.
4) Other theory?
Please offer discussion to support your choice.
Reply With Quote