Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,445

1 members and 1,444 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,934
Threads: 249,129
Posts: 2,572,283
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LavadaCanc
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Threaded View

  1. #15
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-31-2016
    Location
    Kenmore NY USA
    Posts
    928
    Thanks
    434
    Thanked 380 Times in 273 Posts
    Images: 5
    It’s very easy to ridicule a position by pushing it to the farthest extremes... it’s called the “slippery slope” logical fallacy, Zina.

    Human beings have been manipulating animal genetics to meet our needs, desires and vanities pretty much forever: more wool, more white meat, more milk production; flatter faces, excessively sloped hips, colors/patterns.
    Manipulating genes for desired/targeted traits has also yielded undesired/unexpected traits. This cannot be negated.

    Right, wrong, or indifferent, people have the power to decide the genetic makeup of animals. People who believe the end product is worth the problems have the ability and legal right to propagate and sell that end product. People who believe the problems outweigh the value of the end products have the right to not purchase them or propagate them.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DLena For This Useful Post:

    C.Marie (03-02-2018),Godzilla78 (03-01-2018),PokeyTheNinja (03-01-2018)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1