Quote Originally Posted by Eric Alan View Post
Now that's interesting. I'm not sure I agree with all of the long-term benefits being worth the effort, but I can see where you're going with this.

How are you establishing your baseline? Where is the input "teaching" data coming from? Beyond your Mojave/Phantom example, have you expanded to any other morphs?
I am confident I can do pastel. Other than that the computer only knows my animals if that makes any sense. I just do not have enough single gene animals in the numbers it would take to establish greater accuracy. The program knows my lesser is a lesser but she is the only single gene lesser I have. Most of my single gene stuff is Mojave, Phantom and a few Pastels. All my yellowbelly stuff is tied up in Supers and ALS. I have two single gene enchis of the exact same quality. etc. I can pull images from the internet but it is very time consuming to find images that are good enough. The age of the animal is also a factor. The computer tells me yes that is a mojave but internally to the system it may be known as a hatchling mojave. You are right, it is time consuming because I am doing everything myself. Right now I am trying to gather data for yellowbellys and gravels. Problem is I do not trust the images on the internet to be accurate. I need to find someone that is 100% sure that they have a couple single gene gravels that would be willing to take some good pictures for me.

In hindsight, it would not help my gravel project, but I should have taken more pictures of the single gene animals I have produced and kept more holdbacks. I am really trying to keep the whole thing fun though so I am trying to limit the size of my collection. I am at around 50 animals right now. At around 100 its going to start smelling like work.