http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/0...ls-on-flights/
This story really brings home the difference between a true "service animal" under the ADA (see http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm) and the legal requirements that businesses must follow when making accommodations for them, versus what is needed for a mere "emotional support animal" (ESA).
I also noticed that snakes are specifically prohibited as ESA's by the airlines in the cabin area, which IMO is stupid. Unlike cats, dogs, monkeys, and birds/fowl, which are being permitted:
- They have no dander so there are no worries about allergic reactions from the other passengers.
- They're not going to jump up and slobber all over everyone on the plane.
- They are quiet.
- They are easily contained in a bag or rubber tub.
- Their "output" can be regulated based on feeding schedule.
Reply With Quote