Quote Originally Posted by alan12013 View Post
I think the pattern is cool on that snake. I'm looking at a few normals (related) that have some off the wall patterns that I was hoping to incorporate into my single gene mad scientist projects. I can't tell visually what is different about the monarch from a normal. I saw your originals in from 99 and WOW was that the standard for pastels back then? If I posted that now people would tell me I had a normal lol Maybe not that bad but still, they did have awesome blushing. That gene (pastel) has come a LONG way!
I was wondering how the stripe is included in any of this. Is that part of the gene or was there a het some where...
I'm confused because it looks like the ghost gene when combined with the pastel and super pastel but it brightens up the genetic stripe? Some of your old pictures are gone too.
So the 99 pastels produced a genetic stripe offspring, pastels, super pastels and???
Alan,

Yes, the original Pastels are very ugly indeed.....almost hard pressed to call them pastel! Both of these Pastels turned out to be double hets....het for Monarch, and het for Genetic Stripe. When I bred these together the first time I only got two good eggs. I now know that the two babies are a Monarch Super Pastel Genetic Stripe, and a Monarch Pastel. The following year I got a seven egg clutch. 2 super pastels, 1 genetic stripe, 1 pastel genetic stripe, 1 super pastel genetic stripe, 1 Monarch Genetic Stripe, and the first single gene Monarch.