Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 615

2 members and 613 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Senior Member Bluebonnet Herp's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-28-2012
    Location
    Helotes, TX
    Posts
    1,161
    Thanks
    1,405
    Thanked 476 Times in 316 Posts

    Re: Question about the new possible boa constrictor ban

    The species being regulated are the species being listed by the FWS, or at least what the FWS defines as a species. (While Burmese pythons were declared a separate species from Indian rock pythons, FWS ignored this. In addition, if Boa constrictor imperator is declared a separate species from B. c. constrictor based on recent new evidence, they would likely ignore this as well.) The Lacey Act regulations generally go by specific scientific names, not common names. Dumeril's boas are taxonomically arranged as Acrantophis dumerili, not Boa constrictor, therefor, they are not a boa constrictor and not proposed to be regulated.
    The regulation itself only prohibits interstate transport and importation. In other words, it would be a felony if you took your prohibited species from, say, Texas to Oklahoma because you were moving or attending an expo. It would also be illegal to ship out of state, as most online breeders do. Therefor, it would end the online sales that typical ship across the country, such as selling a prohibited species from California to South Carolina because that would mean the animal is leaving one state and entering another. In general, the law kills both the availability as well as a motivation for breeding them. But it does not ban keeping them altogether, although local and state regulations vary and some do put outright bans on animals that are regulated by the Lacey Act or the Endangered Species Act. In addition, it is also still legal to export your animals, so in theory, you could still breed a prohibited species to sell to Europe or some other foreign market, although shipping is much more expensive as you can imagine.

    The currently prohibited species are as follows:
    • Indian Rock Pythons (Python molurus, including Burmese pythons as FWS recognizes them being a subspecies, P. m. bivittatus)
    • North African Rock Pythons (P. sebae)
    • South African Python (P. natalensis)
    • Yellow Anaconda (Eunectes notaeus)


    The other snakes originally refrained from being listed and are now being considered for listing are as follows:
    • Boa constrictors (Boa constrictor; all subspecies, including but not limited to B. c. constrictor, B. c. imperator, and B. c. occidentalis)
    • Reticulated Pythons (Python reticulatus or, being that FWS recognizes it, Broghammerus reticulatus. Includes all subspecies and dwarf races.)
    • Green Anaconda (Eunectes murinus)
    • De Schauensee's Anaconda (E. deschauenseei)
    • Bolivian Anaconda (E. beniensis)


    *Please note that De Schauensee’s anacondas and Bolivian anacondas do not exist in the North American or European trade. For whatever reason the USGS included it in their "study" is unknown.
    The only reason why these animals were chosen is because they were considered in the USGS's deceptive "study." I would not be surprised if they were to do another "study" including ball pythons, dumeril's boas, and many other python and boa species and considered barring their ownership as well, simply because they can't consider any new laws or listings without having "evidence" to refer to.

    Quote Originally Posted by colton62 View Post
    This is just killing all the breeding being done. I've always loved Burms and want a granite but now I can't because the government thinks that they're dangerous.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    You need to move to Texas. Just saw some Burm juvies at a recent expo.

    Edit:
    Quote Originally Posted by reptileexperts View Post
    The Lacy act was put into place to protect species from being exploited in nations where they offer no protection from export. Basically, the original purpose of this was to ban the import of these species into the US even if the country of origin will allow them to be exported (either legally, or illegally through bribe). This gives animals a chance to prosper by taking away the pressure from the import of these species into the US as "rare" commodities. The lacy act in and of itself is a very powerful tool. However, it is being twisted by the government at current to be used as a method of control for species crossing state lines, because this law specifically regulates these animals not only from import, but from crossing state lines.

    Take away the government trying to regulate the snake trade (leave that to the states) and the Lacy act is a GREAT thing (places like Africa will pretty much allow you to get endangered species out with a bribe, as well as many countries in South America). But given the way the government is abusing its power (Shocked face) its turning a good thing into a horrible thing.
    And this, exactly. The listing of the current snake species is nothing short of abusive use of the Lacey Act.
    Last edited by Bluebonnet Herp; 06-29-2014 at 06:57 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1