Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,599

0 members and 1,599 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 76,073
Threads: 249,220
Posts: 2,572,808
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LeonoraOrdonez5
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Threaded View

  1. #14
    BPnet Senior Member kitedemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-01-2010
    Location
    NS Canada
    Posts
    6,062
    Thanks
    657
    Thanked 1,795 Times in 1,391 Posts
    Images: 11
    I did miss what you intended. I get what you are saying but you have made two assumptions. Your scenario is great if you are using a on off t-stat and if your room temp is reasonably stable.

    A proportional t-stat feathers the power and usually does not deliver 100% power or at least only rarely. The second issue is if the ambient air temps drop the rheostat will limit the max heat and if that temp is not enough to over come the rooms ambient temp the hot spot gets too cold. Racks don't do well in cool rooms so that isn't a big issue with a rack but when applied to an enclosure it can be.

    Your car analogy is great but if using a proportional t-stat it is more like an accelerator (t-stat) and a governor (rheostat) restricting the flow of gas to the engine. That is great until you need just a bit more speed than normal and the rheostat will not allow it.

    The new generation of t-stats are very 'smart' they are able to shut down power if they detect over temps but also under heating too. So if the probe gets pulled away from the heat source. (very real possibility with a rack) they add an extra bit of safety margin. I still recommend a dual t-stat set up especially in cool environments it allows the primary to do its job but if it fails or something happens the secondary will shut down the power to the primary.

    The numbers are my own numbers and variable but this is the basic idea. Either way we are saying the same thing a T-stat should have a secondary safety system. A t-stat should have something to else in the advent of catastrophic failure.

    Hosted on Fotki

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kitedemon For This Useful Post:

    QuidsBalls (05-01-2012),whispersinmyhead (02-28-2013)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1