Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,384

1 members and 1,383 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,934
Threads: 249,128
Posts: 2,572,279
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, LavadaCanc
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Threaded View

  1. #11
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Genetics confusion

    Quote Originally Posted by JLC View Post
    Ok....this is MY understanding of how this terminology is typically used in the ball python morph world.

    The term "het albino" is just a shortened version of "heterozygous for albino".

    Therefore, the term "het lesser" would have the same connotation, "heterozygous for lesser".

    And given the utter confusion on the matter, no matter which side of the argument a person is on, why should "het" be used in reference to lessers (and other dom/co-dom morphs) in the first place? Applying the term "het" in such a redundant fashion IS confusing. You don't call an albino a "super albino" or a "homo albino". It's just an albino.
    The terminology we typically use isn't "correct" on many accounts (co-dom vs incomplete dom), but majority of people using it makes it correct now doesn't it? I see this as another case. Technically Het for Albino is not correct at all, it is het albino. Heterozygous is an adjective. Its like saying "My snake is a pretty for albino" vs "My snake is a pretty albino"

    We take it as them meaning the same thing (we both agree on that), but why use the funny sounding long version? Popularity I guess. I understand none of us here started using it that way and many people say it but still..... to me it seem we are implying het means something other than heterozygous. I see that as just complicating things for those who want to learn what is actually going on. No i'm not going to go to a show and sell my het lessers, its not the popular terminology but it doesn't make het lesser incorrect.

    I'm not on a mission to "be right", I would just like to see this stuff get easier instead of more complicated. Theres hardly a difference between the genotype names and phenotype names we are calling them in this thread.

    Heres a translator....
    obviously theres a few odds balls like lucys and what not, but that sums up most of them. They don't have to be separate things and we can still keep the short phenotype names, but popular terminology seems to be heading toward them being separate and I see that causing more confusion.
    Last edited by OhhWatALoser; 09-12-2011 at 05:44 PM.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to OhhWatALoser For This Useful Post:

    Jessica Loesch (09-12-2011)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1