my high horse LOL come on SON! im not versed in the constitution or bill of rights. but I do know that it does not make any sense to own venomous animals in my opinnion which is exactly that an opinion. also I think that owning POTENTIALLY dangerous animals is more of a pissing contest than anything. more of a childish look at my cool toy lol get over your self people now adays are allways trying to push the limits of society, we have to realize that the things we do such as owning a tiger or a venomous animal could potential affect other peoples lives than our own. As a tax payer Im glad that I live in Ca and that crazy people who could potentially be neighbors cant own large cats or monkeys or even venomous animals. thats all im saying. my point in above posts was that the government/ and state have the right to tell u waht u can and cant own obviously! thats just common knowledge, this is hilarious. I believe the quote was " who are you to tell me what I can and cant own, no one has that right" some thing along those lines. WELL NEWS FLASH CHIEF STATE AND FED LAW. LOL


also we "discust" you im sorry. this THREAD IS ABOUT FATAL ATTRACTIONS and how the people on that show are dead cause they are ignorant and cant correctly take care of there animals or have animals they are not capable of keeping. thats why we joked about the darwan awards. do u have a relative on the show, i dont get your absolute "disgust" regarding our convo?
It's people like you that really bother me. The government makes more and more law to "protect" us when they should be focusing on the state deficit's that each state is facing. I believe CA has one of the worst deficits? Correct? Good thing your glad your taxes are going "protecting" you. Most of us are concerned about the fiscal aspect and the unemployment rate in the country.

The government doesn't need to tell us what pets to own. If my tiger gets out, killing someone, I should be persecuted to the full extent of the law, meaning i should either recieve the death penalty or life in jail. It was my fault someone was hurt, not anyone elses. Why should others be punished for the irresponsible? The only reason there is so much of an attack on our hobby is because its one of the few things that the government doesnt have its nose in. Maybe they should be focusing on the hundreds of other things. Maybe how our country has dropped so low in the sciences and mathematics, and how we can barely keep up with education anymore. Maybe they should focus on themselves, the uselessness of the government.

The government shouldn't have the right to tell us what pets we can own. Do you know how many dog related injuries there are? I work at a vet's office and its a normal thing to have a rabies quarantine in the office once a week because the owners didnt remember to get the vacination and their dog bit someone.

The government is getting its nose into business it should never be concerned about. I believe the quote is, "The government that governs least is best". The American government has controlled more and more, yet becomes more useless.

Owning our exotics is our right. If someone's pet kills someone, they should be persecuted as if they had done it themselves. Maybe then the truly irresponsible people will realize it's not worth the risk, and the ones that love the hobby and can control the animal will make up the mass majority of the keepers.