Defects happen, doesn't mean its linked to anything. and did they have spider in their ancestry? im sure alot of them don't.
Every time someone has a spiderxsomething breeding and doens't report normals having a wooble (which there has to be thousands by now) is proof to me. just because a handful of snakes have a wooble negates the fact that the rest don't?
Where is the proof tho? Every single spider is a carrier for the wooble, which has to make it dominate, people say its link because the sibling don't have it, plain and simple if you ask me. I mean what other genetic scenario are you thinking is going on here? thats what i think im really not understanding you.
Another issue all together... but again wheres the proof lol? I think outcrossing makes better looking animals with the right selective breeding, but I have yet to see any proof of inbreeding doing anything. and don't give me the bullcrap of look snake born without eyes, snake with kinks blah blah blah.... did you know unrelated breedings do that also? again defects happen, now if repeated breedings of related pairs constantly produced defected babies, that would be proof.
![]()