Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 714

0 members and 714 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,909
Threads: 249,108
Posts: 2,572,138
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KoreyBuchanan
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Threaded View

  1. #1
    BPnet Senior Member Boanerges's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-09-2008
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    7,022
    Thanks
    1,673
    Thanked 2,011 Times in 1,840 Posts
    Images: 57

    White Stands by Ban of Daley; But Diaz Attack on 'Mayhem' Doesn't Warrant Punishment

    In an interview with Yahoo! Sports this week, UFC president Dana White said that he doesn't get along with Josh Koscheck, but regardless of his feelings towards the oft loathed welterweight, what Paul Daley did to him following their UFC 113 bout is inexcusable.


    “I’m no Josh Koscheck fan. Personally, I think he’s jerk.We actually don’t get along very well. I like Paul Daley a lot, but what he did was inexcusable. He walked over to Koscheck and Koscheck could have thought he was coming over to shake hands or congratulate him and he took a cheap shot at him like that. If you throw a sucker punch like that after a fight in the UFC, I don’t care who you are, you’re done. He’ll never fight for us again.”

    When asked if it was somewhat hypocritical that one of his other contracted fighters, Nate Diaz, was handed no punishment for his role in the brawl that occurred immediately following the Strikeforce: Nashville event last month, White said comparing the two incidents would be like comparing apples to oranges. According to White, Diaz, who could clearly be seen laying the boots to a turtled Miller while his Team Cesar Gracie teammates barraged the defenseless Team Quest fighter with punches, was not at fault for his actions, because "he's a Diaz" and because Miller instigated the brawl.


    “Mayhem got into the cage when he didn’t belong inside there. He didn’t belong in the interview, but he forced his way into [Jake] Shields’ interview and he started a fight. When you start a fight next to the Diaz brothers [Nathan’s older brother, Nick, was also involved], what do you think is going to happen, particularly if you start a fight with someone from their crew?"

    Standing by his decision not to punish Nate, White pointed to the reason he cut the older Diaz brother from the UFC -- a brawl with Joe Riggs in a hospital emergency room following their UFC 57 fight -- as being a real offense because of where it happened. For the record, Riggs was not cited for his involvement in the melee.


    “I cut Nick Diaz after he was fighting [Joe Riggs in an emergency room] at the hospital [in Las Vegas following a Feb. 4, 2006, fight]. People are sick and dying and you can’t be in the hospital fighting. I cut the guy even though I know he’s a very good fighter. But the thing with Jake Shields happened because someone wasn’t in control of the cage and let Mayhem in where he didn’t belong. That caused everything else.”


    So by Dana's reasoning, shouldn't Daley still be a UFC employee as referee Dan Miragliotta should be responsible for not preventing the attack on Koscheck since he should have been in control of the cage?
    -Cage Potato
    -Italicized word was added by me to replace a word that went against our TOS
    I agree with the ban of Daley and I agree with not doing anything to Diaz simply because Diaz was not at a UFC match. Why should Dana punish him for something he did durring a strkeforce event? Had that happened at a UFC event and Dana did nothing it would be a different story...
    Last edited by Boanerges; 05-12-2010 at 07:34 PM.
    Jeff Bernard

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1