Thats exactly what I was talking about in a post the other day! They did post a news article about finding it suspicious that the man didnt answer the question when asked if he was abusive to the little girl and if there had been an incident that night. Before the snake was found on her.

What gets me about the reports now is they are saying the little girl had multiple bites. One on her forehead and others on her arms.. That doesnt make any sense. None at all. If she had that much damage from the tiny tiny little teeth that even a 10 ft Burm has.. Something is not right. Someone is lying about something. Ive been bit by these guys before. They do not have teeth like a retic. They are little bitty pin prick teeth. Even on the big guys!

And at first they say its 12 ft but then they say it was 8 ft? Every report I can find says something different. Why cant they just republish it and tell the truth? That they are suspicious and never believed from the start that the snake actually killed her

That post bt Wildmoprhs is AWESOME btw. I borrowed it. Hope you dont mind. We need to find a way to open the eyes of the mammel owners.

I wonder how we can find out how many people in senator nelsons family have a pet?