Congressional Budget Office to "Score" HR2811

[I<3Dreamsicles]

"Not really" would be the important part there. "Not really", but somewhat. They have some serious restrictions on them, especially on guns. Yes, as crazy as it sounds to some people, I am against those licenses too. But that's not the point of this particular discussion. What it boils down to, and keep in mind this is only my opinion, is that I don't feel the need to acquire permission from some bureaucrat to own a kingsnake, or a ball python, or a 20 foot retic. That's my business, as long as it doesn't harm anyone else.

Like I said though, just my opinion.

So with that mind set your saying anyone should be able to drive a car, thats their buisness. Even if they drive drunk??? What about if they are a kid? 12 years old. No need for a license, hey no age limit. Who cares, they havent hurt anyone -- YET --
Or if a burm owner doenst properly secure its cage??? Or you can own a gun as long as you dont hurt anyone. Guns go off on accident.
The thing is STUFF happens. Thats why there are rules and regulations to prevent it.

Are you against restrictions that prevent felons from owning guns? What about people with violent a history?
And driving license restrictions really arent very serious. All you have to do is prove you can operate a vehicle with out crashing it, with in what... 3 minutes of a driving test? Then YOU PASS! Your are now deemed skilled enough to drive anywhere at any time because of those three minutes of driving well.