» Site Navigation
0 members and 594 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,117
Posts: 2,572,189
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
|
-
Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?
Hi,
 Originally Posted by Oxylepy
Yeah, the Lessers (the ones from the platty) are het for a recessive gene that brightens up colours.
That video gives more proof that it's a recessive gene that will act on other morphs (the butter-daddy).
As for it being entirely white: it could be a supper lesser (BEL) or it could be an all white pied (in which case it's eyes may not be blue, although there is still a possibility, someone would need to confirm this with a pied over the eyes snake).
 Originally Posted by Oxylepy
But if you bred those third generation snakes back to their parent or to a platty daddy you could get a platty daddy.
It sounds as if you're saying that Lessers from a Platty Daddy clutch do not have the hidden gene, when in reality EVERY one of the offspring from a Platty are ALL het for the hidden gene, the normals and the Lessers.
One of the nice things about this is: You can breed your own Lesser to another Lesser and happen to get a Daddy, or you can even breed your own Lesser to a seemingly normal ball and get a Daddy. I believe every Lesser is from the Daddy, and there are a lot of people with Lessers right now and a lot of normal offspring from Lessers, so you can never really know if you have one with the hidden trait or not.
 Originally Posted by Oxylepy
Which would all make sense since it's a recessive trait (the daddy gene). But when you first said it:
It sounded as if you were claiming that none of the Lessers from a clutch sired by a daddy had the daddy gene in them, but they do, it's just het and to show it needs to be hom.
 Originally Posted by Oxylepy
Oh I actually went back and looked at that video and it's stunning, yeah I like to jump into conversations ~_~
That could just be a fluke, not that I am hoping it was but just that it is a possibility. Then again it may not be a simple Lesser Pied, it could be a Lesser het Daddy Pied, all of which would require more investigation.
Every one of the points above is completely wrong I'm afraid. 
The dilute daddy gene is not reccesive - it is either dom or co-dom.
It is an allele of the white snake complex ( as far as we know at the moment ) so the platty daddy can give either one of the genes ( dilute or lesser ) to his offspring but not both.
So if you have a lesser it absolutely does not contain the gene responsible for making daddys.
It therefore cannot make a daddy no matter how many of its offspring you breed it back to.
The white snake in Ralphs video cannot be a super lesser because only one of the parents was a lesser. It also wouldn't contain the dilute daddy gene unless Ralph made the het pied from a lesser sib fathered by a platty daddy or by breeding a platty daddy to a pied.
dr del
Derek
7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|