Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 600

0 members and 600 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,197
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Registered User temec's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-02-2008
    Location
    southern California
    Posts
    335
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 28 Times in 24 Posts

    I just found a loop-hole ish thing in HR 669

    It states that to be put on the Preliminary Approved List it must be:
    •Not likely to be harmful to the United State’s economy, environment or other animals’ or human health
    OR
    • May be harmful “but already are so widespread in the United States that it is clear to the Secretary that any import prohibitions or restrictions would have no practical utility for the United States.”

    I feel that most of the herps we keep are already very very widespread, I know that some people keep herps that are rare. I'm still mad at the bill overall but the second bullet point may let us still keep a lot of herps that we already have.


    source: http://www.pijac.org/files/public/US_HR_669.pdf
    Last edited by temec; 04-07-2009 at 06:50 PM. Reason: added source
    1.0.0 ball python (normal)
    0.1.0 BCI RTB

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1