Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 684

2 members and 682 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,915
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,196
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, KBFalconer
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40
  1. #11
    BPnet Veteran Wh00h0069's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    4,349
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 832 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by AaronP View Post
    It is possible to get normal's from a BEL breeding. If one of the BEL's parents was a normal carrying the lucy gene, which does happen, what do you think a Vin Russo Het Lucy is? They're really just normals that are Het BEL.
    A BEL can not be a normal carrying the gene. A BEL is a super form. I think you may be referring at a lesser or Russo het Lucy, which is not a super form.
    Eddie Strong, Jr.

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran icygirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-02-2007
    Location
    Mass.
    Posts
    1,439
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 139 Times in 117 Posts
    Images: 11

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Interesting...

    Here's another question... If you bred a Mojo to a Lesser and got a BEL, and then bred the BEL to a normal (no hidden genes involved), then would you get a clutch of Mojos and Lessers? Or is it not that simple? This is assuming that Mojo x Lesser can make BEL's.

  3. #13
    BPnet Veteran Wh00h0069's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    4,349
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 832 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by icygirl View Post
    Interesting...

    Here's another question... If you bred a Mojo to a Lesser and got a BEL, and then bred the BEL to a normal (no hidden genes involved), then would you get a clutch of Mojos and Lessers? Or is it not that simple? This is assuming that Mojo x Lesser can make BEL's.
    It is that simple.
    Eddie Strong, Jr.

  4. #14
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-18-2008
    Posts
    2,754
    Thanks
    710
    Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by Wh00h0069 View Post
    A BEL can not be a normal carrying the gene. A BEL is a super form. I think you may be referring at a lesser or Russo het Lucy, which is not a super form.
    I didn't say a "Normal" is a BEL or could produce a BEL, I said that a BEL could produce Normals that are Het. Lucy.

    Russo Het Lucy + Russo Het Lucy = Russo BEL

    Russo BEL + Normal = Russo Het Lucys (Which Look like Normals)

    People have produced BELs before from breeding Lessers, Mojaves, etc to "Normals" which turned out to be carrying the Lucy gene.

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-04-2008
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 43 Times in 35 Posts

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Mojave, Lessers, Russo het lucy/high yellow/lemon line, butters when combined with each other or with themselves can produce a super "lesser complex" blue eyed lucy.
    A phantom combined with lesser has been proven to produce a BEL as well.
    The homozygous form of the phantom is not a typical BEL.
    The "hidden gene"/"Platty gene" plays no part in the creation of BELs.
    No one knows for sure whether the woma hidden gene and lesser complex hidden gene have anything to do with each other yet, it is just a theory.
    A BEL bred to any morph or normal will not produce normals because they pass one of their alleles down to the offspring making them at the least heterozygous for their respective trait.
    A BEL or any super form is not the same as a bumblebee. You do not get any BELs in a clutch involving BEL X Normal, the bumblebee traits have the ability to produce themselves.
    -Steven

  6. #16
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-04-2008
    Posts
    214
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 43 Times in 35 Posts

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by AaronP View Post
    I didn't say a "Normal" is a BEL or could produce a BEL, I said that a BEL could produce Normals that are Het. Lucy.

    Russo Het Lucy + Russo Het Lucy = Russo BEL

    Russo BEL + Normal = Russo Het Lucys (Which Look like Normals)

    People have produced BELs before from breeding Lessers, Mojaves, etc to "Normals" which turned out to be carrying the Lucy gene.
    Sorry to point out the false information you are attempting to pass on, BUT... a Russo het lucy is not a normal. They are distinguishable from normals making them a codom trait.
    There are no "normal het lucies".
    That is like saying that yellowbellies are normal het ivory. They are not normal looking.
    -Steven

  7. #17
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    08-18-2008
    Posts
    2,754
    Thanks
    710
    Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by stevenkeogh View Post
    Sorry to point out the false information you are attempting to pass on, BUT... a Russo het lucy is not a normal. They are distinguishable from normals making them a codom trait.
    There are no "normal het lucies".
    That is like saying that yellowbellies are normal het ivory. They are not normal looking.
    -Steven
    *sigh*

    I'll have to hunt down the RR show where a big breeder talked about "Surprises". I think it was a Barcyzk show but I'm not sure, at work right now.

    And every Russo I've ever seen looked pretty darn normal to me, and a few breeders whom I've talked to about them. Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean I'm "spreading false information"

    I'd also like to point out that I said they Look LIKE normals, but they aren't. It's a co-dominate trait because 50% of it's offspring will carry the lucy gene, well that applys to Het Albinos too you know, they look like normals but they carry the Albino gene with a 50% chance of passing on it's genes when bred to a normal. The homozygous form = Albino, no different for a Russo, except the Homozygous form = a BEL.
    Last edited by AaronP; 02-12-2009 at 02:41 PM.

  8. #18
    BPnet Veteran Shadera's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-27-2008
    Posts
    1,735
    Thanks
    717
    Thanked 538 Times in 376 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by Wh00h0069 View Post
    It is that simple.
    And..The lesser/mojave cross BEL produces a whiter head than the super mojave BEL.
    `*`

  9. #19
    BPnet Veteran dreese88's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-25-2008
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    1,027
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 156 Times in 128 Posts

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    I have a hard time telling normal's from Het lucy's, but the belly's give it away for me. They have a clear bell with no markings at all. Which I would say make them distinguishable and not like het for recessives
    Dylan -- Reese Reptiles

  10. #20
    BPnet Royalty OhhWatALoser's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-2007
    Location
    Suburbs of Detroit
    Posts
    4,986
    Thanks
    530
    Thanked 2,721 Times in 1,477 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Blue Eyed Leucistics - question regarding BluEL offspring

    Quote Originally Posted by AaronP View Post
    *sigh*

    I'll have to hunt down the RR show where a big breeder talked about "Surprises". I think it was a Barcyzk show but I'm not sure, at work right now.

    And every Russo I've ever seen looked pretty darn normal to me, and a few breeders whom I've talked to about them. Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean I'm "spreading false information"

    I'd also like to point out that I said they Look LIKE normals, but they aren't. It's a co-dominate trait because 50% of it's offspring will carry the lucy gene, well that applys to Het Albinos too you know, they look like normals but they carry the Albino gene with a 50% chance of passing on it's genes when bred to a normal. The homozygous form = Albino, no different for a Russo, except the Homozygous form = a BEL.
    straight from NERD... no they don't look normal, which is why its co-dom, you do know that albino is a recessive trait right?


    Genetics
    Co-dominant

    The Russo het Leucistic is named for Vin Russo @ Cutting Edge Herp, who produced stunning, clean white Blue-Eyed Leucistics from breeding his "high yellow lemon" ball pythons together. To avoid confusion with other mutations sharing similar names, this particular bloodline has been dubbed the Russo het Leucistic. These are beautiful ball pythons, with bright pigmentation, white highlights & an unmarked belly. Russo het Leucistics often exhibit busy lateral patterns with a donut or "keyhole" shape. The resulting Blue-Eyed Leucistics from this line are extremely clean, bright white with minimal (if any) markings. Subsequent breedings have determined the Russo hets to be compatible with Mojaves in producing Blue-Eyed Leucies.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1