Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 747

1 members and 746 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,102
Posts: 2,572,091
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Avian Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,088
    Thanks
    603
    Thanked 2,145 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1

    Just out of curiosity

    Okay, I'm curious on this matter so I'll ask.

    The difference between saying you would do something and you are going to do something is clearly distinguishable correct? If you you would do something it's a general statement, but if you say that you're going to do something it can be taken as an action.

    For instance:
    "I'd headbutt my monitor if it flashed"

    or

    "I would to headbutt my monitor if it flashes"

    So my point is that the two are clearly distinguishable between a statement versus an action. Right?
    Last edited by Neal; 08-16-2013 at 10:31 PM.
    -Birds-

    0.1 - Poicephalus senegalus - Stella (Senegal Parrot)
    0.1- Poicephalus rufiventris - Alexa (Red-bellied Parrot)



  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran txcoker's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-22-2012
    Location
    Magnolia, Texas
    Posts
    302
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 139 Times in 83 Posts
    Images: 77
    Yes, you are correct.

    Now what is the back story to ask that question?

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to txcoker For This Useful Post:

    Neal (08-17-2013)

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran MootWorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-15-2012
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,365
    Thanks
    325
    Thanked 512 Times in 418 Posts
    Images: 10

    Just out of curiosity

    In those two examples, 'I'd' is short for 'I would', so I'm not exactly understanding the question lol.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MootWorm For This Useful Post:

    BrianB801 (08-25-2013),dr del (08-17-2013),Freakie_frog (08-17-2013),Neal (08-17-2013)

  6. #4
    BPnet Lifer Eric Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-01-2013
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    4,511
    Thanks
    2,927
    Thanked 3,889 Times in 1,948 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Based on your initial question, the two are clearly distinguishable. However, your example is not one that represents your thoughts well (unless I'm clearly missing your point).

    "I would/wouldn't xxxx if yyyy," is different than, "I will/won't xxxx when yyyy."

    The first statement represents a hypothetical situation regarding a possible reaction from a possible future action (e.g., "last two people on earth"). The second statement represents a guaranteed reaction based on a guaranteed future action.

    Put another way: "Will" is used to talk about definite future actions. "Would" is used to talk about preferences.

    Way to make me all philosophical-like on a Friday night, BTW...
    Last edited by Eric Alan; 08-17-2013 at 12:07 AM.
    Find me on Facebook: E.B. Ball Pythons and Instagram: @EBBallPythons

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Eric Alan For This Useful Post:

    Neal (08-17-2013)

  8. #5
    BPnet Veteran BrandiR's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2012
    Location
    Richland, WA
    Posts
    1,127
    Thanks
    731
    Thanked 1,042 Times in 501 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Technically they're distinguishable if I understand you correctly. I still think most people are going to take them as basically the same thing though. Try, "I'd like to..." instead.

    "I would punch that guy in the face." - Cause/Effect, if he _______, I'd jack his jaw.

    "I will punch that guy in the face." - Gonna Do It, there will come a time, no doubt about it, that you are going to punch that guy in the face.

    "I'd like to punch that guy in the face." - You don't like him, you don't like his actions/attitude/whatever, you believe it would be awesome to clock him, but you're not going to.
    Adversity does not build character, it reveals it

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BrandiR For This Useful Post:

    h00blah (08-17-2013),Mike41793 (08-17-2013),Neal (08-17-2013)

  10. #6
    Avian Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,088
    Thanks
    603
    Thanked 2,145 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1
    I was more or so doing it just to make sure that I was correct in what I was thinking. I guess it's all basically on how somebody interprets something even though they're not right about something. Thanks all for your answers
    -Birds-

    0.1 - Poicephalus senegalus - Stella (Senegal Parrot)
    0.1- Poicephalus rufiventris - Alexa (Red-bellied Parrot)



  11. #7
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Or you could, sensibly, not say either where you know beforehand they will not be welcome.
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  12. #8
    Avian Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,088
    Thanks
    603
    Thanked 2,145 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Quote Originally Posted by dr del View Post
    Or you could, sensibly, not say either where you know beforehand they will not be welcome.
    Yea but it was the general statement, who knew that would be the outcome?
    -Birds-

    0.1 - Poicephalus senegalus - Stella (Senegal Parrot)
    0.1- Poicephalus rufiventris - Alexa (Red-bellied Parrot)



  13. #9
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Everyone else who didn't make a similar statement?

    Seriously - go look up a version of family friendly that includes statements like that. Post 1920's please.
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  14. #10
    Avian Life Neal's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-23-2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    7,088
    Thanks
    603
    Thanked 2,145 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8
    Images: 1

    Re: Just out of curiosity

    Quote Originally Posted by dr del View Post
    Everyone else who didn't make a similar statement?

    Seriously - go look up a version of family friendly that includes statements like that. Post 1920's please.
    Well everybody has their own point of view. It's all good though.
    -Birds-

    0.1 - Poicephalus senegalus - Stella (Senegal Parrot)
    0.1- Poicephalus rufiventris - Alexa (Red-bellied Parrot)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1