Your best bet to prove it out would be to use a visual Pied. Why take a chance on a 100% Het or PH? The visual Pied would also ensure you get at least 100% Het babies.
Pied x 100% Het gets you 50% odds at a visual Pied.
100% x 100% only gets you 25% odds at a visual Pied.
Your best bet to prove it out would be to use a visual Pied. Why take a chance on a 100% Het or PH? The visual Pied would also ensure you get at least 100% Het babies.
Pied x 100% Het gets you 50% odds at a visual Pied.
100% x 100% only gets you 25% odds at a visual Pied.
thought the best way to prove them out would be to do 100% het x 100% het. and if one comes out visual then they are hets?
with a pied x poss het or het you would only have a chance to get a pied and hets, and it doesnt prove it out, its like breeding a pied x normal but with the hets if you get a visual?
or did i miss something
Last edited by snowcolt; 02-05-2013 at 01:56 AM.
Reason: sorry if this is confusing
thought the best way to prove them out would be to do 100% het x 100% het. and if one comes out visual then they are hets?
with a pied x poss het or het you would only have a chance to get a pied and hets, and it doesnt prove it out, its like breeding a pied x normal but with the hets if you get a visual?
or did i miss something
You missed a lot..........................
You are trying to prove out one snake, not two.
When dealing with recessive genes, both snakes have to carry the gene to get a visual.
If you use a visual to a het/ph and get a visual in the clutch then you have proven out your het/ph BUT if you don't get any visuals then you at least know the clutch is all 100% het because you used a visual in the pairing.
i was thinking of you had a pied x het then it would be like a pied x normal that you might get a pied because of the visual, but all you would have is hets not a visual. but i understand
with a pied x het if you get a pied its proved out.