Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 1,011

3 members and 1,008 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,928
Threads: 249,128
Posts: 2,572,274
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, arushing027
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran Navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-25-2012
    Location
    Milton, Florida
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts

    Is it true two supers cannot produce fertile eggs?

    I always thought they could, but I currently have some friends over and we've been debating whether they can or can't.

    Right now we're comparing super lessers

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    05-13-2012
    Posts
    484
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
    I'm not sure where you got that info. I do not see why they couldn't.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to MorphMaster For This Useful Post:

    Navy (06-26-2012)

  4. #3
    BPnet Lifer angllady2's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-18-2009
    Location
    St. Louis, MO.
    Posts
    3,642
    Thanks
    1,937
    Thanked 1,914 Times in 1,149 Posts
    Absolutely not true.

    Now, there are instances of certain super forms of a morph can produce babies that fail to thrive. The super HG woma comes to mind. But just a super form bred to another doesn't have that problem. I know plenty of people who breed super to super every season with no trouble.

    Gale
    1.0 Low-white Pied - Yakul | 1.0 Granite het Pied - Nago
    1.0 Mojave - Okoto | 1.0 Vanilla - Kodama
    1.0 Pastel - Koroku | 1.0 Fire - Osa
    0.1 het Pied - Toki | 0.1 het Pied - Mauro
    0.1 Mojave - Kina | 0.1 Blushback Cinnamon - Kuri
    0.1 Fire - Mori | 0.1 Reduced Pinstripe - Sumi
    0.1 Pastel - Yuki | 0.1 Dinker Normal - Akashi
    0.1 Ghana Giant Normal - Tatari | 0.1 Dinker Normal - Kaiya

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to angllady2 For This Useful Post:

    Jason Bowden (06-26-2012),Navy (06-26-2012)

  6. #4
    BPnet Veteran Navy's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-25-2012
    Location
    Milton, Florida
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    112
    Thanked 48 Times in 39 Posts

    Re: Is it true two supers cannot produce fertile eggs?

    Quote Originally Posted by MorphMaster View Post
    I'm not sure where you got that info. I do not see why they couldn't.
    I've heard the rumor several times, but ignored it until today.
    Quote Originally Posted by angllady2 View Post
    Absolutely not true.

    Now, there are instances of certain super forms of a morph can produce babies that fail to thrive. The super HG woma comes to mind. But just a super form bred to another doesn't have that problem. I know plenty of people who breed super to super every season with no trouble.

    Gale
    That's great to know, thank you.

  7. #5
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    05-13-2012
    Posts
    484
    Thanks
    80
    Thanked 66 Times in 61 Posts
    O and gale is right about the hidden gene woma. The pearl is a fatal gene. There are many rumors though. You just have to wait until they're proven to know the truth. Just like are desert females fertile (I'll put money on the fact that they are lol).

  8. #6
    BPnet Royalty Mike41793's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-15-2011
    Posts
    16,925
    Thanks
    6,667
    Thanked 7,981 Times in 5,584 Posts
    Ive heard super x super crossing can produce more genetic defects. Not that it cant be done though.

    Like super cinni x super cinni = more kinking

    Anyone else heard/notice this?
    1.0 normal bp

  9. #7
    BPnet Senior Member Andybill's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-04-2012
    Location
    Shelton, Wa
    Posts
    2,958
    Thanks
    1,147
    Thanked 1,319 Times in 1,088 Posts
    Images: 7

    Re: Is it true two supers cannot produce fertile eggs?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike41793 View Post
    Ive heard super x super crossing can produce more genetic defects. Not that it cant be done though.

    Like super cinni x super cinni = more kinking

    Anyone else heard/notice this?
    I have just noticed that there seems to be more defects with super cinnies in general mostly with the duck bill thing but I have seen more instances of defects in super cinnies than almost any of the other morphs. I have heard also the SC X SC produces more kinking than just cinnie X cinnie....
    -Andrew Hall-

    Good night Chesty, wherever you are....


  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Andybill For This Useful Post:

    Mike41793 (06-26-2012)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1