Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 597

1 members and 596 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,200
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25
  1. #21
    BPnet Senior Member Robyn@SYR's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-09-2009
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,525
    Thanks
    200
    Thanked 956 Times in 385 Posts
    Gorgeous animal, fascinating visuals, sorry to hear of the loss.

  2. #22
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1
    Interesting theory, about the super champagne. I suppose a genetic glitch could occur on occasion that would cause a super to appear from a normal breeding. (Like hatching a BEL from a lesser to normal pairing). Extremely rare, though.

    There seem to be far fewer dominant ball python mutations than there are incomplete dominant ones, and people are extremely quick to label a mutation 'dominant' if they don't see a super form appear in a few breedings.

    A morph is only dominant if you can get a super form that looks exactly like the single gene form, but produces 100% morphs when bred to a normal. Otherwise, it hasn't been proven to be dominant. For example, the spider morph--NOT dominant. The absence of any super at all, identical or different, tells us that it's not a dominant mutation. If it were, the super would be identical to a single-gene spider...not missing completely.

    So, if no super champagne (that produces all champagnes when bred to a non-champ) has been produced, then it's not proven dominant. It COULD be another co-dom with a lethal super form. Considering how squirrely some champagne combos seem to be, it's not unlikely.
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WingedWolfPsion For This Useful Post:

    angllady2 (06-07-2012),SaintTawny (06-07-2012)

  4. #23
    BPnet Lifer snakesRkewl's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-14-2009
    Location
    Milwaukie, Oregon
    Posts
    7,665
    Thanks
    2,687
    Thanked 3,036 Times in 2,147 Posts
    Images: 2
    I don't have any champs, but if you ask me it looks like a hypo champ aka Mimosa
    Jerry Robertson

  5. #24
    West Coast Jungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-07-2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,184
    Thanks
    624
    Thanked 1,370 Times in 943 Posts
    Images: 43

    Re: Weird outcome Champagne pairing

    Quote Originally Posted by snakesRkewl View Post
    I don't have any champs, but if you ask me it looks like a hypo champ aka Mimosa
    That was my first impression. Sorry for the loss, it was stunning snake.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to West Coast Jungle For This Useful Post:

    snakesRkewl (06-08-2012)

  7. #25
    BPnet Veteran Capray's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-17-2012
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    1,928
    Thanks
    1,025
    Thanked 476 Times in 445 Posts
    Images: 6

    Re: Weird outcome Champagne pairing

    I really like the last one. Beautiful clutch. I'm sorry for your loss. He/she was beautiful. Dad looks great too!!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1