Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 661

0 members and 661 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,910
Threads: 249,114
Posts: 2,572,185
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 62
  1. #21
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    01-30-2009
    Posts
    6,112
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 1,689 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Images: 4
    This snake is genetically Flawed and will pass on the bug eyes if bred. Why pay 1300$ for a genetically flawed morph when you can get perfect ones no flaws what so ever and breed it.


    Regardless if its cute or not, It should not be at market value.

  2. #22
    BPnet Senior Member WingedWolfPsion's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-27-2007
    Location
    Plattsmouth, NE
    Posts
    5,168
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,134 Posts
    Images: 1
    Is bug-eyes tied directly to the Lesser Platinum gene? If it is, then the snake is not genetically flawed at all.

    If bug-eyes is caused by an additional recessive gene that's present in Lesser Platinum lines, you would expect to see normal snakes from Lesser clutches throwing bug-eye offspring as well.

    Unless this gene reacts with something in the lesser gene to produce bug eyes--or reacts only when the lesser gene is doubled, to produce this effect.

    I think it's HIGHLY premature to call this a genetic flaw, though, until further research is done. It's like saying the spider wobble is a genetic flaw in spiders--it's not, it's part of the spider gene itself and cannot be bred out. (You could call the spider gene itself the flaw, but most of us like them anyhow).

    So, the question becomes, is the bug-eyes caused by an additional gene reacting to lesser platinum, or the SAME gene as lesser platinum. It's a crucial difference.

    Does the problem cause any actual issues, or it is purely cosmetic?
    Last edited by WingedWolfPsion; 03-06-2012 at 03:07 PM.
    --Donna Fernstrom
    16.29 BPs in collection, 16.11 BP hatchlings
    Eclipse Exotics
    http://www.eclipseexotics.com/
    Author Website
    http://donnafernstrom.com
    Follow my Twitters: WingedWolfPsion, EclipseMeta, and EclipseExotics

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WingedWolfPsion For This Useful Post:

    LotsaBalls (03-07-2012),satomi325 (03-06-2012)

  4. #23
    BPnet Lifer Rob's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-20-2012
    Posts
    4,653
    Thanks
    1,692
    Thanked 2,646 Times in 1,686 Posts
    More like awesome bug eyes, if it doesn't effect the snakes vision and he's happy and healthy I say the eyes look cool and unique

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Rob For This Useful Post:

    jennmbarker (05-20-2016)

  6. #24
    BPnet Veteran RobNJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-25-2011
    Location
    North Jersey
    Posts
    1,852
    Thanks
    383
    Thanked 789 Times in 548 Posts

    Re: worst bug eyes i've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RichsBallPythons View Post
    This snake is genetically Flawed and will pass on the bug eyes if bred. Why pay 1300$ for a genetically flawed morph when you can get perfect ones no flaws what so ever and breed it.


    Regardless if its cute or not, It should not be at market value.
    Are bug eyes a passable trait, or are they a flaw within the super lesser/butter only? While I understand where you're coming from, I don't understand why this argument presents itself when it comes to bug eyes, kinks, duck bills, yet spider wobbles(a genetic flaw) have sold fine for years.

  7. #25
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    01-30-2009
    Posts
    6,112
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 1,689 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Images: 4
    I have seen bug eyes from lesser clutches where normals and lessers had the bug eyes.

    To say the bug eyes are acceptable but then a kink isnt dont sound right. Theres kinks out there and dont harm the snakes that will live well. But if someone sells one their completely market way down not kept at top dollar. I would never breed this animal in the likes of producing more bug eyes, The same you wouldnt breed a kinked snake as well

  8. #26
    BPnet Veteran filly77's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-02-2008
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    804
    Thanks
    389
    Thanked 110 Times in 98 Posts

    Re: worst bug eyes i've ever seen

    Does mojo x mojo cause bug eyes?
    0.1 ♥♥♥Mojave, Peyote ♥♥♥
    1.0 Pastave,
    1.0 Ghost, Marley
    1.0 Pastel Male, Houdini
    0.2 Normals, Violet & Indigo
    1.1 Het Hypos, Striker & Charger
    1.0 German Shepherd Dog, Apollo
    0.1 Chihuahua, Brooklyn
    0.2 Min Pins, Isis & Vixen
    0.2 Cats, Spook and Miffy
    0.0.3 Super Blue Dendrobates Auratus
    rats, 0.2 'tiels, ~sings~ and a partridge in a pear tree..
    ~RIP Ekektra we miss you every second of the day 5/27/09 - 7-04-10~

  9. #27
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    01-30-2009
    Posts
    6,112
    Thanks
    1,163
    Thanked 1,689 Times in 1,200 Posts
    Images: 4
    mojo x mojo does not, Strictly the butter/lesser gene that does so.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RichsBallPythons For This Useful Post:

    filly77 (03-06-2012),WarriorPrincess90 (04-09-2012)

  11. #28
    BPnet Veteran satomi325's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-15-2011
    Location
    In a galaxy far,far away.
    Posts
    6,423
    Thanks
    2,429
    Thanked 3,969 Times in 2,446 Posts
    Images: 5

    Re: worst bug eyes i've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by WingedWolfPsion View Post
    Is bug-eyes tied directly to the Lesser Platinum gene? If it is, then the snake is not genetically flawed at all.

    If bug-eyes is caused by an additional recessive gene that's present in Lesser Platinum lines, you would expect to see normal snakes from Lesser clutches throwing bug-eye offspring as well.

    Unless this gene reacts with something in the lesser gene to produce bug eyes--or reacts only when the lesser gene is doubled, to produce this effect.

    I think it's HIGHLY premature to call this a genetic flaw, though, until further research is done. It's like saying the spider wobble is a genetic flaw in spiders--it's not, it's part of the spider gene itself and cannot be bred out. (You could call the spider gene itself the flaw, but most of us like them anyhow).

    So, the question becomes, is the bug-eyes caused by an additional gene reacting to lesser platinum, or the SAME gene as lesser platinum. It's a crucial difference.

    Does the problem cause any actual issues, or it is purely cosmetic?
    Good questions.

    I would imagine that the bug eyes only occur when the gene is doubled, which is why butterxbutter/lesserxlesser/lesserxbutter's have such a significant turn out... I'm not sure on the percentages, but no body really hears about mojavexmojave getting bug eyes.

    I wonder if there are functional issues with the bug eyes as well.
    I imagine that the ones up for sale are eating alight, so maybe it's just cosmetic? Either way, ball's don't really need eyesight to survive in captivity. Ben Siegel has an eyeless ball that eats and lives perfectly fine.

    That's just my 2cents and opinion.

  12. #29
    Registered User Wonzzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-2007
    Posts
    133
    Thanks
    39
    Thanked 53 Times in 34 Posts
    Images: 11
    Show me a photo of a sub-adult or adult ball python with bug eyes. I am sure they grow into their bug eyes as adults. I have only been breeding for four years, and have never seen an adult with bug eyes.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
    Justin Orbach


  13. #30
    BPnet Lifer Annarose15's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-25-2010
    Location
    Gainesville, GA
    Posts
    3,632
    Thanks
    1,537
    Thanked 1,708 Times in 1,206 Posts

    Re: worst bug eyes i've ever seen

    Quote Originally Posted by RichsBallPythons View Post
    This snake is genetically Flawed and will pass on the bug eyes if bred. Why pay 1300$ for a genetically flawed morph when you can get perfect ones no flaws what so ever and breed it.


    Regardless if its cute or not, It should not be at market value.
    Of course, the unfortunate catch-22 is that as soon as it gets marked down, someone would buy it and brag about the great deal they got on their new breeder...
    Last edited by Annarose15; 03-06-2012 at 05:17 PM.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1