I will say my fire female, who is not the best quality, looks very normal in shed. So, there is a slight chance it is a poor quality fire, but I would be very hesitant. My fire male on the other hand, who is very high quality, still looks like a fire even in shed. Bottom line, if you want a fire to make beautiful babies with, she is not the snake to use, if she even is a fire. Spend a little more and get a high quality girl.
Gale
Last edited by angllady2; 09-30-2011 at 09:29 PM.
1.0 Low-white Pied - Yakul | 1.0 Granite het Pied - Nago
1.0 Mojave - Okoto | 1.0 Vanilla - Kodama
1.0 Pastel - Koroku | 1.0 Fire - Osa
0.1 het Pied - Toki | 0.1 het Pied - Mauro
0.1 Mojave - Kina | 0.1 Blushback Cinnamon - Kuri
0.1 Fire - Mori | 0.1 Reduced Pinstripe - Sumi
0.1 Pastel - Yuki | 0.1 Dinker Normal - Akashi
0.1 Ghana Giant Normal - Tatari | 0.1 Dinker Normal - Kaiya
Well the two pics I posted of the snake were her before shed, so thats as good as she gets. She looked really dark in shed when I saw her. I was just hoping for them to be right about the fire gene because she was at least 2 years old and was close to breeding size.
I contacted them yesterday and told them no thanks.
I also agree on normal. very ausome lookin girl but id probe or pop it before purchasing it to make sure its female. i bought a bp last year for 50 bucks. said it was a male and turned out to be female. external triats such as tail thickness and all that arent an exact science. good luck
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by SquamishSerpents
