Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 679

1 members and 678 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Wilson1885
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-01-2010
    Posts
    479
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 105 Times in 89 Posts

    S373 question and discussion

    So we have all hopefully been sending letters in to our local senators and supporting USARK in their mission to get S373 hopefully thrown out. But how much does everyone really know about it?

    As far as what species are being banned..I've heard that it includes every species of the python genera(which I'm pretty sure would include ball pythons??) to just the 9 species that the USGS had on their list(all those awesome big snakes*burms, retics, boas, anacondas, and rocks*).

    So please everyone post what you know about this bill as far as the species being banned, the poor science that this law is based upon, and just keep spreading the word so that we can stop the foolish government from taking away our snakes!!!

  2. #2
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    07-22-2009
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    396
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 310 Times in 101 Posts
    As of right now, S373 lists only the 9 species.
    Specialty Serpents
    www.specialtyserpents.com

  3. #3
    BPnet Veteran grits's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-08-2010
    Location
    new iberia La
    Posts
    533
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
    Images: 75

    Re: S373 question and discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by ER12 View Post
    As of right now, S373 lists only the 9 species.
    Which is 9 too many

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    11-01-2010
    Posts
    479
    Thanks
    75
    Thanked 105 Times in 89 Posts

    Re: S373 question and discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by grits View Post
    Which is 9 too many
    Thats a fact!! I feel awful for all the people who have already invested so much time and effort and not to mention mucho $$$ into big snakes just to have them taken away because of some foolish foolish people... I wanted to get into retics next year but now I'm scared to because I dont want to drop a couple thousand to get started to just have it all taken away by some stupid law...

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-05-2010
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    22
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Images: 4
    Bill Nelson is our US Senator from here in Florida.

    I emailed him and placed particular emphasis on not including boa constrictor on that list of 9 snakes.

    Nelson refuses to budge. He says boa constrictor has an established population south of Miami.

    Nelson also says that the reason they are banning the big 9 is not just because of their size; more specifically, it is because of the big 9's particular impact on the local ecosystem.

    Nelson is fooling no one here. This isn't about the ecosystem. Nelson just doesn't like big snakes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1