Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 843

0 members and 843 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,905
Threads: 249,107
Posts: 2,572,120
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Pattyhud
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25
  1. #1
    Registered User USARK.Jonathan.Brady's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-02-2010
    Posts
    143
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 184 Times in 48 Posts

    UPDATE: California

    UPDATE: California
    Los Angeles County: Ordinance to Amend Title 10 – Animals
    Proposed regulatory changes in Los Angeles County could have shut down or forced relocation of Reptile & Tropical Fish breeders, dealers and pet stores. Although primarily aimed towards dogs and cats it would have had a devastating impact on the Reptile Nation in LA County.
    If enacted the new regulations would have required:

    1. Cages would not be allowed to be stacked.
    2. 24/7 staffing if have more than 50 animals in the facility. See proposed Section 10.40.010(Z). If less than 50 animals, you must have adequate staffing for at least 8 hours a day. If you have more than 50 fish, reptiles, birds, etc., or any combination thereof, you must staff the facility 24/7.
    3. Records must be kept on each "Animal". "Animals" defined in Section 10.08.020 any animal, bird, reptile or fish.
    4. Proprietary business information will be available to the public (that could mean Animal Rights groups).
    5. The Department may also impose “reasonable conditions” on a breeding license for any non dog or cat breeder.

    Click here to read LA County Regulatory Proposal:
    http://www.usark.org/uploads/LAcountyRegs.pdf

    USARK engaged on this issue at all levels with staff and leadership at LA County Animal Care & Control and Board of Supervisors prior to hearings that were held March 9th & 10th. On March 9th Christine Roscher testified on behalf of USARK. Christine asked that the ordinance be limited to dogs and cats only. As a result The proposed ordinance was removed from the agenda for the LA County Board of Supervisors for March 16, 2010. The ordinance will be re-evaluated by LA County to ensure that animals “other than dogs and cats” are excluded from the requirements, as appropriate.

    This information is from Patricia Learned, Executive Assistant to the Director, Department of Animal Care and Control, Marcia Mayeda.
    Click here to read USARK testimony in LA County: http://www.usark.org/uploads/LA%20Co...0Testimony.pdf

    California Department of Fish & Game: Turtles, Frogs & Heloderma


    There will be a hearing to discuss agenda items on April 7th & 8th in Monterey.
    Item 21. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO
    SECTIONS 671, 671.1, 671.7 AND 703, TITLE 14, CCR, RE: NEW RESTRICTED
    SPECIES PERMITS AND REQUIREMENTS. (Helodermas)
    Item 25. POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF COMMISSION POLICY, RE: NON-NATIVE FROGS AND
    TURTLES (Will not effect Herpetoculture or pets)

    USARK has continued to be engaged with the Commission and the Department on these issues. Our Senior California Adviser George Osborn has arranged two high level meetings with the DFG since the hearing last month. We have established USARK as a resource to the Department and have offered our expertise in addressing issues. USARK Director Doug Price will give testimony on both agenda items for the Reptile Nation.

    There Is Strength in Numbers... Protect Your Rights! We can win this fight!!
    For questions and comments, please email
    USARK.Jonathan.Brady@gmail.com
    JOIN USARK! http://www.usark.org/join.php

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to USARK.Jonathan.Brady For This Useful Post:

    broadude (04-12-2010),jfreels (04-08-2010)

  3. #2
    BPnet Veteran redstormlax12's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-16-2009
    Location
    Saranac Lake, New York, United States
    Posts
    659
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 150 Times in 120 Posts
    Images: 5

    Re: UPDATE: California

    Who thinks of these bills? Comedians? Because keeping tabs on 50 fish and making the store be staffed 24/7 if that have 50+ fish is ridiculous. Thank you for keeping us updated, and for all the work you put in. You are truly saving our hobby.
    Connor Paschke
    Pre-vet Major at SUNY Plattsburgh

    1.0 Jungle Carpet Pythons (Headhunter lineage)
    1.0 Dwarf Albino Reticulated Python (Steve Gooch)

  4. #3
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    03-27-2008
    Location
    Tri-State
    Posts
    296
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 41 Times in 37 Posts

    Re: UPDATE: California

    Every time you look a new law is proposed to destroy our hobby. It's getting to the point where it's only a matter of time a piece of legislation going to hit us where it hurts. I hope that day doesn't come, but it's getting to that point.

  5. #4
    Registered User The Plumber's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-17-2010
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Re: UPDATE: California

    Wow.. Thats crazy..

  6. #5
    West Coast Jungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-07-2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,184
    Thanks
    624
    Thanked 1,370 Times in 943 Posts
    Images: 43

    Re: UPDATE: California

    You guys rule. Thanks for all you do!

  7. #6
    BPnet Veteran Raptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-14-2009
    Posts
    1,346
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 320 Times in 204 Posts

    Re: UPDATE: California

    2. 24/7 staffing if have more than 50 animals in the facility. See proposed Section 10.40.010(Z). If less than 50 animals, you must have adequate staffing for at least 8 hours a day. If you have more than 50 fish, reptiles, birds, etc., or any combination thereof, you must staff the facility 24/7.
    So I need staff for my tank of guppies?

    Now, I can say staff would be handy for the goats. However, the wording raises a question. If you're a private owner of say..animals of one species, i.e mice/rats. That falls under the rule of 50 animals. You still need staff?

    1.0 Western Slender Glass Lizard; Logos
    0.1 Charcoal Cornsnake; Morana
    1.0 Golden Gecko; Smoothie
    1.1 African Plated Lizard; Cypher and Nara

  8. #7
    Registered User shootingstar26's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-30-2010
    Location
    Tarzana, CA
    Posts
    94
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Images: 6

    Re: UPDATE: California

    I apologize for my ignorance; I understand that this is proposed legislation to regulate the hobby of animal husbandry, but I admit that I don't fully understand what's going on.

    Living in LA county, this would obviously affect me. Could someone please explain?
    sorry for taking your time =\

  9. #8
    BPnet Veteran nixer's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-28-2007
    Location
    indiana
    Posts
    2,827
    Thanks
    339
    Thanked 329 Times in 294 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: UPDATE: California

    wow i have more than 50 fish lol
    and way more than 50 herps.
    and i hold a full time job which at times can be 8hrs-24 hours i still find the time

  10. #9
    BPnet Veteran Moofins07's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-06-2009
    Location
    BC, Canada - near Vancouver
    Posts
    453
    Thanks
    141
    Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: UPDATE: California

    So, in short, having a single tank of feeder goldfish would require 24/7 staff, including records? Wow. I had no idea goldfish were, let alone any common pet store fish species, were so "out of hand" and required such immediate attention.

    This continually reminds me just how much I "love" people.
    0.1 '09 Normal Ball Python - Sheva
    1.0 Crested Gecko - Sol
    1.0 SHTCTB Leopard Gecko - Paradox
    1.0 Cockatiel - Mo (Mohawk)
    0.1 Peachfaced Lovebird - Bean
    0.2 Mischievous, long-haired cats - Moxxi and Azura
    And 1.0 incredible, loving husband.

  11. #10
    BPnet Veteran MarkieJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-18-2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    894
    Thanks
    731
    Thanked 331 Times in 249 Posts
    Images: 38

    Re: UPDATE: California

    Reminds me of this crazy story from England where they had a police sting operation over the sale of goldfish to children under 16 years of age. Wonder if it would ever get to this point around here...

    http://video.ca.msn.com/watch/video/...fish/17yvf28pd

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1