» Site Navigation
1 members and 629 guests
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.
» Today's Birthdays
» Stats
Members: 75,916
Threads: 249,118
Posts: 2,572,199
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
|
-
BPnet Veteran
1.0 Normal Ball Python (Monty)
Various fish
0.1 Wife 
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Dino eating snake
Too bad S373 didn't exist back then. Maybe the dinosaurs could have been saved, instead of going extinct due to careless owners letting their pets go.
"If I were stranded on a desert island and could only have one book, record and person...I'd probably die of exposure."
czphotography
-
The Following User Says Thank You to panthercz For This Useful Post:
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Dino eating snake
Fascinating read, though I would have liked to hear more about how long that particular species was. I'd imagine it was huge if it was eating neonate sauropods (the article seemed to be trying to imply it could have been large enough to potentially eat much larger ones, but I highly doubt that). Thanks for the article.
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Dino eating snake
Neonate sauropods could be surprisingly tiny - hatchling skeletons at Auca Mahuevo in Argentina would have been about 15" long - and a lot of that is neck and tail.
Still, a very, _very_ cool discovery!
~Bruce
-
-
BPnet Veteran
Re: Dino eating snake
 Originally Posted by BrucenBruce
Neonate sauropods could be surprisingly tiny - hatchling skeletons at Auca Mahuevo in Argentina would have been about 15" long - and a lot of that is neck and tail.
Still, a very, _very_ cool discovery!
~Bruce
Wow, I wasn't aware of that. A lot of my knowledge of dinosaurs comes from the early 90's, so it's a bit outdated. That'd be some serious growth though.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|