Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 597

0 members and 597 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 47,180, 07-16-2025 at 05:30 PM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,912
Threads: 249,115
Posts: 2,572,187
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, coda
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45
  1. #31
    BPnet Veteran Lucas339's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-08-2008
    Location
    Fort Pierce
    Posts
    2,104
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 389 Times in 366 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcrystal22 View Post
    I see this mentioned 4 or 5 times by different people (not meaning to specifically pick on your posts, but they were the first ones).
    He states, as well as his birthing records state that he bred a Lesser Het. Pied x Pied. Which means the Pied parent had NO Lesser gene making the Super Lesser Pied an impossible option for that pairing.

    Edit: As dr del had already stated, oops. Oh well, further clarifying a point.
    sorry if i didn't pick though RDR's birth records to see. its a disappointing cross.

  2. #32
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sprinkles View Post
    Because butters and lessers are essentially the same morph, just with slightly different colors. Much in the same way that black pastels and cinnies are the same gene from two different lines.
    So you're claiming that the Butter he produced off the Butter x Platty Daddy was actually a Lesser and that he doesn't know his snakes?

    Yeah, it's a Butter, and there is no reason it should exist if the Daddy gene is actually an allele of the Lesser complex. If it were then, again, all offspring would HAVE to be either Lessers or Daddys. If only one gene for Daddy is required to make a Lesser/Butter stand out then he would either get Lesser Butters or Butter Daddys, however he did not, instead he got a Normal Butter and a Butter Daddy. Mind that a Lesser Butter was still an option, he just didn't get one.

    So once again there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that these could be alleles.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies

  3. #33
    BPnet Veteran Fearless's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-18-2006
    Location
    Sterling, CO
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 51 Times in 48 Posts
    Images: 55

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    I'm with Dr Del on this one, and that the lessers do not carry the hidden gene to make a platy daddy, only the normal siblings carry this trait. I don't do a whole lot of posting but I do a ton of reading and research on "scratch your head" genetic stuff and am sure that the only way to make a platty is combining a lesser with a hidden gene female. Not a lesser to lesser even if they are a direct product of the platty daddy.

    Would love to be able to contribute more on the way that the butter daddy was produced but am unfamiliar with this pairing and have no valuable info to contribute on that subject.

  4. #34
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    02-10-2009
    Posts
    263
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 33 Times in 25 Posts

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxylepy View Post
    Alright, now explain why he produced a Butter and a Butter Daddy off of Platty Daddy x Butter.

    That clutch alone should disprove it being an allele of the Lesser gene.


    He did not breed a Platty Daddy to a butter first off. The breeding was a Daddy (normal sib) to a Butter. So his potential for the clutch is as follows

    25% Butter
    25% Daddy
    25% Butter Daddy
    25% Normal

  5. #35
    Registered User Rasmus Skaaning's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-06-2009
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    67
    Thanks
    62
    Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    It was actually my brother who started this topic for me since he was lurking on this site before me, but i got my own profile now
    Great forum!!

    So i can conclude from the topic that there isnt any pictures, or real "proof", of a Pied with the Lesser-colors?

    Thanks for all the answers guys
    And cool another danish fellow is the first to answer the topic

  6. #36
    BPnet Veteran CoolioTiffany's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-26-2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    4,482
    Thanks
    2,173
    Thanked 765 Times in 649 Posts
    Images: 11

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    If you were to breed a Lesser to a Pied, all offspring would most likely turn out Lessers and BELs het. Pied (anyone correct me if I'm wrong with the outcome of offspring). The Pied gene is recessive, and the Lesser gene is co-dominant, so the Lesser trait would appear in all offspring besides the BELs (super form of a Lesser).

    If you were to breed a Lesser het. Pied x Lesser het. Pied, you would probably get Lessers, BELs, Pieds, and Lesser Pieds. (Again, anyone correct me if I'm wrong. I don't study the Lessers too much.)
    Tiff'z Morphz

  7. #37
    BPnet Veteran Fearless's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-18-2006
    Location
    Sterling, CO
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 51 Times in 48 Posts
    Images: 55

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolioTiffany View Post
    If you were to breed a Lesser to a Pied, all offspring would most likely turn out Lessers and BELs het. Pied (anyone correct me if I'm wrong with the outcome of offspring). The Pied gene is recessive, and the Lesser gene is co-dominant, so the Lesser trait would appear in all offspring besides the BELs (super form of a Lesser).

    If you were to breed a Lesser het. Pied x Lesser het. Pied, you would probably get Lessers, BELs, Pieds, and Lesser Pieds. (Again, anyone correct me if I'm wrong. I don't study the Lessers too much.)
    A lesser bred to a pied would give you lessers het pied and normal het pieds.

    Then on the lesser het x lesser het you are correct.

  8. #38
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin_Hornby View Post
    He did not breed a Platty Daddy to a butter first off. The breeding was a Daddy (normal sib) to a Butter. So his potential for the clutch is as follows

    25% Butter
    25% Daddy
    25% Butter Daddy
    25% Normal
    From the video:

    "09 Clutch Number 16
    This was three eggs from breeding a Platty Daddy to a Butter Female"

    From the site:

    http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/bi.../pythons_2.asp

    "From breeding a Platty male to a Butter female. Not many eggs......I'm hoping for some platties and maybe a "white snake" which would be a combo of the two traits. There were 2 slugs in this clutch. ( 04 butter f # 3 ) "

    Once again, there is no possible way at this point that it could be an allele to the Lesser gene.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies

  9. #39
    BPnet Veteran Oxylepy's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,383
    Thanks
    362
    Thanked 573 Times in 434 Posts

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    And I traced the female back, she doesn't carry the trait maternally, however it doesn't say where the mother's father came from. So it's less likely to be recessive, but still because of that clutch there is no way it can be an allele.
    Ball Pythons 1.1 Lesser, Pastel
    1.0 Lesser Pastel, 0.0.7 mixed babies

  10. #40
    BPnet Veteran Fearless's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-18-2006
    Location
    Sterling, CO
    Posts
    505
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 51 Times in 48 Posts
    Images: 55

    Re: Lesser and Piebalds crossings?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oxylepy View Post
    From the video:

    "09 Clutch Number 16
    This was three eggs from breeding a Platty Daddy to a Butter Female"

    From the site:

    http://www.ralphdavisreptiles.com/bi.../pythons_2.asp

    "From breeding a Platty male to a Butter female. Not many eggs......I'm hoping for some platties and maybe a "white snake" which would be a combo of the two traits. There were 2 slugs in this clutch. ( 04 butter f # 3 ) "

    Once again, there is no possible way at this point that it could be an allele to the Lesser gene.
    Hmmm, I am completely confused. While this breeding is only a week old, give or take, some analysis by someone smarter than me is definately needed. Not sure I completely agree with you yet though. Ralph clearly states in that clutches video that anything bred by a platty daddy carries either A) the Lesser gene or B) the "daddy" dilute

    Well that doesn't work in this clutch due to the fact that there is a butter that doesn't carry either a daddy gene or a lesser gene. I am in no position to question Ralph on anything but something doesn't give here... As I wonder if the butter in this video isn't an actually an odd looking lesser... or if the whole theory of that normal siblings all carry the "daddy" dilute isn't necessarily the case.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1