Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,451

2 members and 3,449 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,097
Threads: 248,540
Posts: 2,568,749
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Travism91
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 72
  1. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    06-20-2008
    Posts
    138
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    What are you suppose to put in the comment section?

  2. #12
    BPnet Veteran Melicious's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-29-2006
    Location
    Fairfax, Virginia; Originally from San Antonio, Texas.
    Posts
    2,135
    Thanks
    120
    Thanked 236 Times in 207 Posts
    Images: 12

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Quote Originally Posted by Mischke View Post
    What are you suppose to put in the comment section?
    Whatever you think you need to say. That's your choice.
    Melanie Ryan Seals

    2.2 Royal Pythons; Hadrian(het. albino), Lucius(het. hypo), Ophelia(normal) and Regan(het. albino).
    1.0 Homo sapien boyfriendidus; Nick AKA Daddy.s




  3. #13
    Registered User crazy4reptiles88's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-20-2008
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    I signed the pention and I hope they don't ban boas and pythons!!
    Melissa
    0.2 dogs "Maya & Daisy"
    0.1 cat "Speckle"
    1.0 bearded dragon "Melloyello"
    0.1 Leopard Gecko "Kiko"
    1.0 crested gecko "Camo"
    1.0 ball python "Monty Python" R.I.P.
    3.3 cockatiels "Graystar, Chiquita, Popeye, Vulture, Ivory, and Avalanche
    1.0 pacific parrotlet "Zazu" R.I.P.
    1.4 mice "Ginger, Any, Minnie, Miny, And Moe
    1.1 Corn Snakes Ruby {Normal Stripe} and Fabio {Butter Motley}

  4. #14
    BPnet Veteran jason221's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-29-2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    760
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Images: 2

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Even if this is passed, ball pythons should be exempt from this as their wild numbers are completely in check and closely regulated. The exportation of these animals from countries such as Ghana is helping to prevent the wild populations from becoming too large while at the same time also being a very successful business for the people living there.
    flickr
    Reptiles: 0.1 Colombian BCI

  5. #15
    BPnet Veteran janeothejungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-09-2006
    Location
    Central Cali
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 427 Times in 162 Posts
    Images: 34

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Well Dudes, Bring on the flaming.

    I'm on the fence on this one. As one who's research is based on invasive species, I can understand the need for legislation to reduce the impact. If the hobby will not regulate itself, it is inevitable that someone else will do it for us. Although I do not agree with HR6311, as it is written, I can respect that there need to be rules. Despite what many of you seem to see as a black/white issue, there are legitimate questions to address here. The days of 'no rules, no regulation' are over. Ask anyone who has had to acquire a permit for their retic. We have the tendency to just yell 'boo-hiss' and pretend regulation is evil and will go away if we keep ignoring it. Instead, we should be looking at this as a chance to influence policy in a constructive way. Yes, we'll all be pissed if they were to shut down our breeding, but would it kill us to regulate the importation of new stock? Would it be a terrible thing to require licensing of large, powerful constrictors? Or of venomous species? Would the hobby die if that happened?

    I happen to think of myself as a 'responsible' hobbyist. I believe in sustainability of as many species as we can bestow it upon. And if everyone who owned or bred herps was responsible about it, this would be a non-issue and I'd be waving pitchforks and protesting it full-force. But we're not. For every reputable, sensible individual in this industry, there are several who are not. All I ask is that you actually read the legislation and consider both sides. Don't just send radical hate mail to your congressmen. Be good stewards of your hobby and offer alternatives. The bill talks about grandfathering, so perhaps suggest it be extended to all CB stock already in the US and any subsequent offspring. Fight for better, more efficient management of importation and regulation. All I'm asking is that we use our heads instead of jumping in with emotion here.


    ~Kat

  6. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to janeothejungle For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked

    blackcrystal22 (02-01-2009),catawhat75 (01-30-2009),chaase321 (01-30-2009),DutchHerp (01-30-2009),Jyson (01-30-2009),Patrick Long (01-31-2009),reptile_jones (02-01-2009),scutechute (01-31-2009),ThyTempest (01-30-2009),twh (01-30-2009),Wh00h0069 (01-30-2009)

  7. #16
    BPnet Veteran janeothejungle's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-09-2006
    Location
    Central Cali
    Posts
    1,189
    Thanks
    61
    Thanked 427 Times in 162 Posts
    Images: 34

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Quote Originally Posted by JasonGranger View Post
    Even if this is passed, ball pythons should be exempt from this as their wild numbers are completely in check and closely regulated. The exportation of these animals from countries such as Ghana is helping to prevent the wild populations from becoming too large while at the same time also being a very successful business for the people living there.
    and again, this is complete hearsay. There is no science, whatsoever, behind this. Please research your facts before furthering the rumors. Who did you hear this from? Were they, by chance, someone who benefits from importing?

    ~Kat

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to janeothejungle For This Useful Post:

    DutchHerp (01-30-2009),reptile_jones (02-01-2009),twh (01-30-2009)

  9. #17
    BPnet Veteran llovelace's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    7,835
    Thanks
    420
    Thanked 1,864 Times in 1,703 Posts
    Images: 4

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Signed
    Check out what's available at


    "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Gandhi

  10. #18
    BPnet Veteran dracovolans's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-25-2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    286
    Thanks
    109
    Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
    Images: 3

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Quote Originally Posted by janeothejungle View Post
    and again, this is complete hearsay. There is no science, whatsoever, behind this. Please research your facts before furthering the rumors. Who did you hear this from? Were they, by chance, someone who benefits from importing?

    ~Kat
    Check out the DVD "Ball Pythons in the Wild" by DR. Steve Gorzula, you would find this info and much more!!

  11. #19
    BPnet Veteran Wh00h0069's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-30-2007
    Location
    Middletown, OH
    Posts
    4,349
    Thanks
    915
    Thanked 832 Times in 736 Posts
    Images: 8

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    Banning people from importing them into the United States would be fine with me as long as we are still able to keep, breed, and transport the ones that are already here. I don't see any reason to import 500,000 ball pythons into the United States each year. I am sure I will get flamed for this, but that is just my opinion.
    Eddie Strong, Jr.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wh00h0069 For This Useful Post:

    Crazygecko (02-01-2009),DutchHerp (01-30-2009),reptile_jones (02-01-2009)

  13. #20
    BPnet Veteran
    Join Date
    10-17-2008
    Posts
    906
    Thanks
    103
    Thanked 722 Times in 382 Posts

    Re: WARNING - BAN ON BOAS & PYTHONS!! - HR6311 Reintroduced as HR669

    I tried signing and it said that I already had. I know that is not correct unless they just carried my sig over from the previous incarnation.

    Anyone else getting this???
    actagggcagtgatatcctagcattgatggtacatggcaaattaacctcatgat

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1