Vote for BP.Net for the 2013 Forum of the Year! Click here for more info.

» Site Navigation

» Home
 > FAQ

» Online Users: 3,349

3 members and 3,346 guests
Most users ever online was 6,337, 01-24-2020 at 04:30 AM.

» Today's Birthdays

None

» Stats

Members: 75,100
Threads: 248,542
Posts: 2,568,763
Top Poster: JLC (31,651)
Welcome to our newest member, Scott L.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Intresting article

    Hi,

    Found this article today and thought it was intresting enough to share.


    dr del
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  2. #2
    Registered User kneepoles's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-05-2008
    Location
    Morehead
    Posts
    86
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Images: 5

    Re: Intresting article

    "Global Warming" is a bit of a misnomer. If you HAD to put a term to the situation, "Global Climate Destabilization" would be a little more in the scope of what's actually happening.
    here's video you might want to watch as well.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDsIFspVzfI

    Chris
    1.0 ('07)Ball Python- Vlad
    1.0('08)cinny- Marius
    0.1 fiance- Keri
    0.0.10 frozen rats

  3. #3
    in evinco persecutus dr del's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2006
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    24,527
    Thanks
    9,263
    Thanked 6,788 Times in 4,306 Posts
    Images: 93

    Re: Intresting article

    Hi,

    Good video - though it does make the somewhat blase assumption that whatever action we could take would actually work.

    Even if humans are not the actual major cause of climactic change.

    I just get a little worried about the number of people using the phrase "worst/ most in recorded history" when the time period of recorded history for this is insignificant compared to the length of the timespans normally associated with climactic, geographic and most other environmental changes.

    I suppose the best possible outcome would be for our great great grandchildren to be saying "what on earth were they worrying about that for?"


    dr del
    Derek

    7 adult Royals (2.5), 1.0 COS Pastel, 1.0 Enchi, 1.1 Lesser platty Royal python, 1.1 Black pastel Royal python, 0.1 Blue eyed leucistic ( Super lesser), 0.1 Piebald Royal python, 1.0 Sinaloan milk snake 1.0 crested gecko and 1 bad case of ETS. no wife, no surprise.

  4. #4
    BPnet Veteran gmcclurelssu's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-29-2008
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts

    Re: Intresting article

    very interesting article, thanks for posting it! i do think its funny how some people try to paint the scientific community as having some kind of consensus on the issue, when there are still a variety of view points and data that the mass media never shows.

  5. #5
    BPnet Veteran nevohraalnavnoj's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2007
    Location
    Norfolk, Virginia
    Posts
    1,098
    Thanks
    57
    Thanked 102 Times in 69 Posts
    Images: 1

    Re: Intresting article

    "we should do something just because of what might happen if we don't" doesn't really make sense. you should turn your computer off right now because it MIGHT blow up!

    Here's a scenario. I own a very large weapons manufacturing plant (which I actually don't, by the way). I also point out that you can not know whether aliens will attack tomorrow or in the future. I can make the same chart that he does, showing that you should arm yourself to the teeth just because aliens might attack.

    I'm not a global warming nay-sayer. I am saying this because he is doing an "expected value" argument and he is essentially assuming equal probabilities for each of the possible outcomes, thus advancing his argument.

    So if aliens have a 50/50 chance of attacking, it makes sense that we should arm ourself against them.

    JonV

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.1